Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26502832›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2016

Transcriptome-wide sequencing provides insights into geocarpy in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.).

Xiaoping Chen, Qingli Yang, Haifen Li, Heying Li, Yanbin Hong, Lijuan Pan, Na Chen, Fanghe Zhu, Xiaoyuan Chi, Wei Zhu and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Deciphering the Proteome and Phosphoproteome of Peanut (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Xiaoping ChenCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Qingli YangShandong Peanut Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Haifen LiCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Heying LiSouth China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanbin HongCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Lijuan PanShandong Peanut Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Na ChenShandong Peanut Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Fanghe ZhuCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyuan ChiShandong Peanut Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Wei ZhuCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Mingna ChenShandong Peanut Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Haiyan LiuCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Zhen YangShandong Peanut Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Erhua ZhangCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Tong WangShandong Peanut Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Ni ZhongCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Mian WangShandong Peanut Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Hong LiuSouth China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Shijie WenCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Xingyu LiCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Guiyuan ZhouCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Shaoxiong LiCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Hong WuSouth China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Rajeev VarshneyCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Xuanqiang LiangCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GAAS), South China Peanut Sub-center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Crops Genetic Improvement, Guangzhou, China.
Shanlin YuShandong Peanut Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A characteristic feature of peanut is the subterranean fructification, geocarpy, in which the gynophore ('peg'), a specialized organ that transitions from upward growth habit to downward outgrowth upon fertilization, drives the developing pod into the soil for subsequent development underground. As a step towards understanding this phenomenon, we explore the developmental dynamics of the peanut pod transcriptome at 11 successive stages. We identified 110 217 transcripts across developmental stages and quantified their abundance along a pod developmental gradient in pod wall. We found that the majority of transcripts were differentially expressed along the developmental gradient as well as identified temporal programs of gene expression, including hundreds of transcription factors. Thought to be an adaptation to particularly harsh subterranean environments, both up- and down-regulated gene sets in pod wall were enriched for response to a broad array of stimuli, like gravity, light and subterranean environmental factors. We also identified hundreds of transcripts associated with gravitropism and photomorphogenesis, which may be involved in the geocarpy. Collectively, this study forms a transcriptional baseline for geocarpy in peanut as well as provides a considerable body of evidence that transcriptional regulation in peanut aerial and subterranean fruits is complex.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantTranscriptomeArachisFruitGene OntologyGravitropismPlant ProteinsSeedsSequence Analysis, RNAPlant Proteinsfruit developmentGeocarpypeanut (Archis hypogaea L.)RNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID26502832
PMCPMC11388922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.