ArticleJAMA internal medicine2015
Progress Toward Consensus on Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines and Reducing Screening Harms.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Article
- Breast Cancer Risk Model Requirements for Counseling, Prevention, and Screening.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2018Article
- Using Collaborative Simulation Modeling to Develop a Web-Based Tool to Support Policy-Level Decision Making About Breast Cancer Screening Initiation Age.MDM policy & practice · 2017Article
- Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in population screening: does it make breast screening worthless?Cancer biology & medicine · 2017Article
- Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.Annals of internal medicine · 2016Article
- Progress Toward Consensus on Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines and Reducing Screening Harms--Reply.JAMA internal medicine · 2016Article
- Breast cancer: Updated screening guidelines - much ado about small improvements.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.