Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26502115›Full record

Observational studyJAMA oncology2016

Racial Differences in the Surgical Care of Medicare Beneficiaries With Localized Prostate Cancer.

Marianne Schmid, Christian P Meyer, Gally Reznor, Toni K Choueiri, Julian Hanske, Jesse D Sammon, Firas Abdollah, Felix K H Chun, Adam S Kibel, Reginald D Tucker-Seeley and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mortality of central nervous system tumors in pediatric patients of Brazil from 1979 to 2019.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marianne SchmidCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian P MeyerCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Gally ReznorCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Toni K ChoueiriDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Julian HanskeCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jesse D SammonVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Firas AbdollahVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Felix K H ChunDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Adam S KibelCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Reginald D Tucker-SeeleyCenter for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Philip W KantoffDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stuart R LipsitzCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mani MenonVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Paul L NguyenDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Quoc-Dien TrinhCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHenry Ford Health System · USUniversität Hamburg · DEDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

Financial well-being following prostate cancer diagnosisK01CA169041 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TUCKER-SEELEY, REGINALD D. · 2012 to 2016
$675k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA169041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThere is extensive evidence suggesting that black men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) have worse cancer-specific mortality compared with their non-Hispanic white counterparts.

objectiveTo evaluate racial disparities in the use, quality of care, and outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in elderly men (≥ 65 years) with nonmetastatic PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis retrospective analysis of outcomes stratified according to race (black vs non-Hispanic white) included 2020 elderly black patients (7.6%) and 24,462 elderly non-Hispanic white patients (92.4%) with localized PCa who underwent RP within the first year of PCa diagnosis in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database between 1992 and 2009. The study was performed in 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Process of care (ie, time to treatment, lymph node dissection), as well as outcome measures (ie, complications, emergency department visits, readmissions, PCa-specific and all-cause mortality, costs) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Multivariable conditional logistic regression and quantile regression were used to study the association of racial disparities with process of care and outcome measures.

resultsThe proportion of black patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent RP within 90 days was 59.4% vs 69.5% of non-Hispanic white patients (P <  001). In quantile regression of the top 50% of patients, blacks had a 7-day treatment delay compared with non-Hispanic whites. (P <  001). Black patients were less likely to undergo lymph node dissection (odds ratio [OR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.66-0.80]; P < .001) but had higher odds of postoperative visits to the emergency department (within 30 days: OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.18-1.86]); after 30 days or more (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.19-1.76]) and readmissions (within 30 days: OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02-1.61]); ≥ 30 days (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.07-1.51]) compared with non-Hispanic whites. The surgical treatment of black patients was associated with a higher incremental annual cost (the top 50% of blacks spent $1185.50 (95% CI , $804.85-1 $1566.10; P < .001) more than the top 50% of non-Hispanic whites). There was no difference in PCa-specific mortality (P = .16) or all-cause mortality (P = .64) between black and non-Hispanic white men. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Blacks treated with RP for localized PCa are more likely to experience adverse events and incur higher costs compared with non-Hispanic white men; however, this does not translate into a difference in PCa-specific or all-cause mortality.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanInsurance BenefitsMedicareProcess Assessment, Health CareProstatectomyWhite PeopleAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsHealth Care CostsHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLogistic ModelsLymph Node ExcisionMaleMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26502115
PMCPMC5018381
OpenAlexW1880231903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.