Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26501981›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Calreticulin Mutations in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Comparison of Three Diagnostic Methods.

Ji-Hye Park, Margaux Sevin, Selim Ramla, Aurélie Truffot, Tiffany Verrier, Dominique Bouchot, Martine Courtois, Mathilde Bas, Sonia Benali, François Bailly and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The molecular management of classic myeloproliferative neoplasm.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. GermlineHaematologica · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ji-Hye ParkService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Margaux SevinInserm U866, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Selim RamlaService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Aurélie TruffotService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Tiffany VerrierService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Dominique BouchotService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Martine CourtoisService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Mathilde BasService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Sonia BenaliService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
François BaillyService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Bernardine FavreService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Julien GuyService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Laurent MartinService d'anatomo-pathologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Marc MaynadiéService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Serge CarilloUMR CNRS 5247, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Laboratoire de Cytologie Clinique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
François GirodonService d'Hématologie Biologique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France; Inserm U866, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France; UMR CNRS 5247, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Laboratoire de Cytologie Clinique, Pôle Biologie, CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; CRB Ferdinand Cabanne, Dijon, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRUniversité de Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calreticulin (CALR) mutations have recently been reported in 70-84% of JAK2V617F-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), and this detection has become necessary to improve the diagnosis of MPN. In a large single-centre cohort of 298 patients suffering from Essential Thrombocythemia (ET), the JAK2V617F, CALR and MPL mutations were noted in 179 (60%), 56 (18.5%) and 13 (4.5%) respectively. For the detection of the CALR mutations, three methods were compared in parallel: high-resolution melting-curve analysis (HRM), product-sizing analysis and Sanger sequencing. The sensitivity for the HRM, product-sizing analysis and Sanger sequencing was 96.4%, 98.2% and 89.3% respectively, whereas the specificity was 96.3%, 100% and 100%. In our cohort, the product-sizing analysis was the most sensitive method and was the easiest to interpret, while the HRM was sometimes difficult to interpret. In contrast, when large series of samples were tested, HRM provided results more quickly than did the other methods, which required more time. Finally, the sequencing method, which is the reference method, had the lowest sensitivity but can be used to describe the type of mutation precisely. Altogether, our results suggest that in routine laboratory practice, product-sizing analysis is globally similar to HRM for the detection of CALR mutations, and that both may be used as first-line screening tests. If the results are positive, Sanger sequencing can be used to confirm the mutation and to determine its type. Product-sizing analysis provides sensitive and specific results, moreover, with the quantitative measurement of CALR, which might be useful to monitor specific treatments.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone Marrow NeoplasmsCalreticulinFemaleFrameshift MutationHumansINDEL MutationMaleMiddle AgedMutationSensitivity and SpecificitySequence AnalysisYoung AdultCalreticulin

Identifiers

PMID26501981
PMCPMC4621046
OpenAlexW1887139886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.