Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26501966›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genomics Virtual Laboratory: A Practical Bioinformatics Workbench for the Cloud.

Enis Afgan, Clare Sloggett, Nuwan Goonasekera, Igor Makunin, Derek Benson, Mark Crowe, Simon Gladman, Yousef Kowsar, Michael Pheasant, Ron Horst and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. BTR: a bioinformatics tool recommendation system.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  13. Short-wavelength-sensitive 1 (Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  14. Automated management of AWS instances for training.GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The Molecular Mechanisms Employed by the ParasiteInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Enis AfganVictorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative (VLSCI), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America; Centre for Computing and Informatics (CIR), Rudjer Boskovic Institute (RBI), Zagreb, Croatia.
Clare SloggettVictorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative (VLSCI), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nuwan GoonasekeraVictorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative (VLSCI), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Igor MakuninResearch Computing Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Derek BensonResearch Computing Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Mark CroweQueensland Facility for Advanced Bioinformatics (QFAB), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Simon GladmanVictorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative (VLSCI), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Yousef KowsarVictorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative (VLSCI), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael PheasantResearch Computing Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ron HorstResearch Computing Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew LonieVictorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative (VLSCI), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalyzing high throughput genomics data is a complex and compute intensive task, generally requiring numerous software tools and large reference data sets, tied together in successive stages of data transformation and visualisation. A computational platform enabling best practice genomics analysis ideally meets a number of requirements, including: a wide range of analysis and visualisation tools, closely linked to large user and reference data sets; workflow platform(s) enabling accessible, reproducible, portable analyses, through a flexible set of interfaces; highly available, scalable computational resources; and flexibility and versatility in the use of these resources to meet demands and expertise of a variety of users. Access to an appropriate computational platform can be a significant barrier to researchers, as establishing such a platform requires a large upfront investment in hardware, experience, and expertise.

resultsWe designed and implemented the Genomics Virtual Laboratory (GVL) as a middleware layer of machine images, cloud management tools, and online services that enable researchers to build arbitrarily sized compute clusters on demand, pre-populated with fully configured bioinformatics tools, reference datasets and workflow and visualisation options. The platform is flexible in that users can conduct analyses through web-based (Galaxy, RStudio, IPython Notebook) or command-line interfaces, and add/remove compute nodes and data resources as required. Best-practice tutorials and protocols provide a path from introductory training to practice. The GVL is available on the OpenStack-based Australian Research Cloud (http://nectar.org.au) and the Amazon Web Services cloud. The principles, implementation and build process are designed to be cloud-agnostic.

conclusionsThis paper provides a blueprint for the design and implementation of a cloud-based Genomics Virtual Laboratory. We discuss scope, design considerations and technical and logistical constraints, and explore the value added to the research community through the suite of services and resources provided by our implementation.

Indexed as

Cloud ComputingUser-Computer InterfaceAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenomicsHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID26501966
PMCPMC4621043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.