SynthesisJAMA surgery2016
Use of Protamine for Anticoagulation During Carotid Endarterectomy: A Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thrombolysis Following Heparin Reversal With Protamine Sulfate in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Case Series and Literature Review.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2019Pooled it
- American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.Blood advances · 2018Guideline
- A Stepwise Haemostasis Intraoperative Protocol Driven Reduction of Haematoma Rate Following Symptomatic Carotidendarterectomy.Vascular and endovascular surgery · 2023Article
- Anesthetic management of carotid endarterectomy: an update from Italian guidelines.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2022Article
- Comprehensive comparison of carotid endarterectomy primary closure and patch angioplasty: A single-institution experience.Surgical neurology international · 2022Article
- A Meta-Analysis of Using Protamine for Reducing the Risk of Hemorrhage During Carotid Recanalization: Direct Comparisons of Post-operative Complications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2020Review
- Variation in Anticoagulation Practices in the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Lab: Results of a Multinational PICES Survey.Pediatric cardiology · 2019Article
- Carotid Endarterectomy in the Southern California Vascular Outcomes Improvement Collaborative.Annals of vascular surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byReply.2017
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceProtamine sulfate can be administered at the conclusion of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to reverse the anticoagulant effects of heparin and to limit the risk for postoperative bleeding. Protamine use remains controversial owing to concern for increased thrombotic complications with its use.
objectiveTo review the evidence for and against protamine use, both in its association with increased thrombotic complications and with decreased bleeding. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline (1946-2014), EMBASE (1966-2014), Cochrane Library (1972-2014), clinical trial registries (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry and clinicaltrials.gov), and abstracts from conferences of the Society of Vascular Surgery (2002-2014) and American Heart Association Scientific Sessions (1980-2014) in November 2014. No language restrictions were applied. STUDY SELECTION: We included clinical trials and observational studies comparing reversal of heparin with protamine sulfate vs no reversal in patients undergoing carotid revascularization and reporting stroke during hospitalization. Of 360 records screened, 12 studies (3%) of CEA were eligible for data pooling. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality. Random-effects models were used to summarize relative risks (RRs). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Stroke after CEA.
resultsWe included 12 observational studies involving 10,621 patients in the meta-analysis. Event rates did not differ significantly between patients who received protamine vs those who did not for the following outcomes: stroke (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.55-1.29; I(2) = 15%; 9 studies), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.53-1.51; I(2) = 0%; 3 studies), or mortality (RR, 0.9, 95% CI, 0.62-1.29; I(2) = 0%; 7 studies). The use of protamine was associated with a significant decrease in major bleeding complications requiring reoperation (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84; I(2) = 32%; 10 studies). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Based on available evidence, the use of protamine following CEA is associated with a reduction in bleeding complications, without increasing major thrombotic outcomes, including stroke, myocardial infarction, or death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.