ReviewJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2016
Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.
Review in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 66 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of a Bio-inspired Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implant Users
Tradeoff Between Spatial Resolution of Neural Excitation and Temporal Rate Processing
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Possible Effects of a Potassium Channel Modulator on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Trial
- Within-electrode temporal envelope processing predicts multi-channel speech outcomes across cochlear implant pulse rates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Simulation of apically grounded cochlear implant stimuli using neural stimulation models.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- A Review of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Disease: Comprehensive Theory and Evidence for Mechanisms of Action.Comprehensive physiology · 2026Review
- Cochlear neural functional competence: an integrative transcriptomic module analysis of excitability, plasticity and microenvironmental support programs.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Establishing reliable neural health measures in adult cochlear implant users.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Power-efficient ramped stimulation in a fully implantable cochlear implant.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Delayed muscle fatigue during electrical stimulation of the proximal nerve using asymmetric random high-frequency carrier pulse cluster.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Pulsatile electrical stimulation creates predictable, correctable disruptions in neural firing.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Understanding the impact of modiolus porosity on stimulation of spiral ganglion neurons by cochlear implants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Galvanic vs. pulsatile effects on decision-making networks: reshaping the neural activation landscape.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- A new method for removing artifacts from recordings of the electrically evoked compound action potential: Single-pulse stimulation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Generation of human otic neuronal organoids using pluripotent stem cells.Cell proliferation · 2023Article
- Using Interleaved Stimulation and EEG to Measure Temporal Smoothing and Growth of the Sustained Neural Response to Cochlear-Implant Stimulation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Article
- Comparison of response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve reported in human listeners and in animal models.Hearing research · 2022Review
- Combining Place and Rate of Stimulation Improves Frequency Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.Hearing research · 2022Article
- Strategies for precision vagus neuromodulation.Bioelectronic medicine · 2022Review
- Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Forward Electric Stimulation-Induced Interference in Intracochlear Electrocochleography of Acoustic Stimulation in the Cochlea of Guinea Pigs.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Intra-Cochlear Current Spread Correlates with Speech Perception in Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wealth of knowledge about different types of neural responses to electrical stimulation has been developed over the past 100 years. However, the exact forms of neural response properties can vary across different types of neurons. In this review, we survey four stimulus-response phenomena that in recent years are thought to be relevant for cochlear implant stimulation of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs): refractoriness, facilitation, accommodation, and spike rate adaptation. Of these four, refractoriness is the most widely known, and many perceptual and physiological studies interpret their data in terms of refractoriness without incorporating facilitation, accommodation, or spike rate adaptation. In reality, several or all of these behaviors are likely involved in shaping neural responses, particularly at higher stimulation rates. A better understanding of the individual and combined effects of these phenomena could assist in developing improved cochlear implant stimulation strategies. We review the published physiological data for electrical stimulation of SGNs that explores these four different phenomena, as well as some of the recent studies that might reveal the biophysical bases of these stimulus-response phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.