ArticleEJNMMI physics2015
Impact of injection dose, post-reconstruction filtering, and collimator choice on image quality of myocardial perfusion SPECT using cadmium-zinc telluride detectors in the rat.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of using counts-per-volume approach with a new SPECT phantom to optimize the relationship between administered dose and acquisition time.Radiological physics and technology · 2023Article
- Capabilities of multi-pinhole SPECT with two stationary detectors for in vivo rat imaging.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging in Rodents: A Review of Methods, Results, and Factors at Play.Frontiers in medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the impact of injection dose, post-reconstruction filtering, and collimator choice on image quality of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using cadmium-zinc telluride (CZT) detectors and (2) to determine how these factors affect measured infarct size in the in vivo rat.
methodsTwenty-four healthy and eight myocardial infarct (MI) rats underwent myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging after injection of various doses (25 to 200 MBq) of (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin using a standard (STD) five-pinhole collimator and high-sensitivity (HS) five-pinhole collimator. Image quality score, contrast-to-noise ratio, sharpness index, coefficient of variation (CV), and measured defect size were assessed as measures of image quality.
resultsThe image quality score increased and CV decreased as a function of injection dose. The contrast-to-noise ratio increased and sharpness index decreased as a function of Gaussian kernel size. When STD and HS were compared, HS tended to show higher image quality score and lower CV than STD. The use of post-reconstruction filter significantly improved image quality score and lessened CV. The reproducibility of defect size measurements, as assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), between the collimators was poor-to-moderate (ICC = -0.31~0.57) with low (25 MBq) injection dose and with no or light (1.5-mm kernel size) filtering, whereas it was good-to-excellent (ICC = 0.75~0.97) with high (200 MBq) dose or low dose with heavy (2.5-mm kernel size) filtering. The filtering-related reproducibility was poor (ICC = -0.18~0.17) for STD with low injection dose, whereas it was good-to-excellent (ICC = 0.79~0.89) for HS. Furthermore, there was a filtering-related underestimation of defect size particularly with the use of heavy smoothing.
conclusionsAppropriate imaging setting is important to obtain high quality images and thereby reliable measurements using a preclinical myocardial SPECT in the rat. When only a low injection dose (25 MBq) is allowed, we would recommend to use HS with light (1.5-mm kernel size) filtering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.