Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26501808›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2015

Effects of ferumoxytol on quantitative PET measurements in simultaneous PET/MR whole-body imaging: a pilot study in a baboon model.

Ronald Jh Borra, Hoon-Sung Cho, Spencer L Bowen, Ulrike Attenberger, Grae Arabasz, Ciprian Catana, Lee Josephson, Bruce R Rosen, Alexander R Guimaraes, Jacob M Hooker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. A Radio-Nano-Platform for T1/T2 Dual-Mode PET-MR Imaging.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radioactive Nanomaterials for Multimodality Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ronald Jh BorraAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. ronald@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Hoon-Sung ChoCenter for Advanced Medical Imaging Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA. cho.hoonsung@mgh.harvard.edu.
Spencer L BowenAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. slbowen@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Ulrike AttenbergerInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. ulrike.attenberger@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.
Grae ArabaszAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. grae@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Ciprian CatanaAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. ccatana@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Lee JosephsonCenter for Advanced Medical Imaging Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA. ljosephson@mgh.harvard.edu.
Bruce R RosenAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. bruce@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Alexander R GuimaraesAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. alex@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Jacob M HookerAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. hooker@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USGordon Center for Medical Imaging · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

Project 4P41EB015896 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2018
$9.8M
Combined MRI/PET Imager for Simultaneous Acquisition of PET/MRI DataS10RR022976 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JENKINS, BRUCE · 2007 to 2007
$2.0M
PEG-like Multimodal Nanoprobes for Imaging Enhanced Permeability RetentionR01EB017699 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NORMANDIN, MARC DAVID · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
PET CAMERA FOR BRAIN IMAGING: SCHIZOPHRENIA, BIPOLAR DISORDERS10RR019933 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SORENSEN, ALMA GREGORY · 2006 to 2006
$500k
F-18 SynthesizerS10RR023452 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BROWNELL, ANNA-LIISA · 2007 to 2007
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR019933NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022976NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023452NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015896NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimultaneous PET/MR imaging depends on MR-derived attenuation maps (mu-maps) for accurate attenuation correction of PET data. Currently, these maps are derived from gradient-echo-based MR sequences, which are sensitive to susceptibility changes. Iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles have been used in the measurement of blood volume, tumor microvasculature, tumor-associated macrophages, and characterizing lymph nodes. Our aim in this study was to assess whether the susceptibility effects associated with iron oxide nanoparticles can potentially affect measured (18)F-FDG PET standardized uptake values (SUV) through effects on MR-derived attenuation maps.

methodsThe study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Using a Siemens Biograph mMR PET/MR scanner, we evaluated the effects of increasing concentrations of ferumoxytol and ferumoxytol aggregates on MR-derived mu-maps using an agarose phantom. In addition, we performed a baboon experiment evaluating the effects of a single i.v. ferumoxytol dose (10 mg/kg) on the liver, spleen, and pancreas (18)F-FDG SUV at baseline (ferumoxytol-naïve), within the first hour and at 1, 3, 5, and 11 weeks.

resultsPhantom experiments showed mu-map artifacts starting at ferumoxytol aggregate concentrations of 10 to 20 mg/kg. The in vivo baboon data demonstrated a 53% decrease of observed (18)F-FDG SUV compared to baseline within the first hour in the liver, persisting at least 11 weeks.

conclusionsA single ferumoxytol dose can affect measured SUV for at least 3 months, which should be taken into account when administrating ferumoxytol in patients needing sequential PET/MR scans. Advances in knowledge 1. Ferumoxytol aggregates, but not ferumoxytol alone, produce significant artifacts in MR-derived attenuation correction maps at approximate clinical dose levels of 10 mg/kg. 2. When performing simultaneous whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/MR, a single dose of ferumoxytol can result in observed SUV decreases up to 53%, depending on the amount of ferumoxytol aggregates in the studied tissue. Implications for patient care Administration of a single, clinically relevant, dose of ferumoxytol can potentially result in changes in observed SUV for a prolonged period of time in the setting of simultaneous PET/MR. These potential changes should be considered in particular when administering ferumoxytol to patients with expected future PET/MR studies, as ferumoxytol-induced SUV changes might interfere with therapy assessment.

Indexed as

Attenuation correctionFerumoxytolMRIMultimodal imagingPETPET/MR

Identifiers

PMID26501808
PMCPMC4544618
OpenAlexW2105462887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.