Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26501561›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Abolishing Fees at Health Centers in the Context of Community Case Management of Malaria: What Effects on Treatment-Seeking Practices for Febrile Children in Rural Burkina Faso?

Thomas Druetz, Federica Fregonese, Aristide Bado, Tieba Millogo, Seni Kouanda, Souleymane Diabaté, Slim Haddad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas DruetzSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 avenue du Parc, Montréal, Québec, H3N 1X9, Canada; University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, 850 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Federica FregoneseUniversity of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, 850 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Aristide BadoBiomedical and Public Health Department, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7192, Burkina Faso.
Tieba MillogoBiomedical and Public Health Department, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7192, Burkina Faso.
Seni KouandaBiomedical and Public Health Department, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7192, Burkina Faso.
Souleymane DiabatéLaval University Medical Research Center (CHUQ), Saint-Sacrement Hospital, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada.
Slim HaddadLaval University Medical Research Center (CHUQ), Saint-Sacrement Hospital, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFUniversité de Montréal · CAHôpital du Saint-Sacrement · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research GIR 127070Canadian Institutes of Health Research GIR 229157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBurkina Faso started nationwide community case management of malaria (CCMm) in 2010. In 2011, health center user fees for children under five were abolished in some districts.

objectiveTo assess the effects of concurrent implementation of CCMm and user fees abolition on treatment-seeking practices for febrile children.

methodsThis is a natural experiment conducted in the districts of Kaya (CCMm plus user fees abolition) and Zorgho (CCMm only). Registry data from 2005 to 2014 on visits for malaria were collected from all eight rural health centers in the study area. Annual household surveys were administered during malaria transmission season in 2011 and 2012 in 1,035 randomly selected rural households. Interrupted time series models were fitted for registry data and Fine and Gray's competing risks models for survey data.

resultsUser fees abolition in Kaya significantly increased health center use by eligible children with malaria (incidence rate ratio for intercept change = 2.1, p <0.001). In 2011, in Kaya, likelihood of health center use for febrile children was three times higher and CHW use three times lower when caregivers knew services were free. Among the 421 children with fever in 2012, the delay before visiting a health center was significantly shorter in Kaya than in Zorgho (1.46 versus 1.79 days, p <0.05). Likelihood of visiting a health center on the first day of fever among households <2.5 km or <5 km from a health center was two and three times higher in Kaya than in Zorgho, respectively (p <0.001).

conclusionsUser fees abolition reduced visit delay for febrile children living close to health centers. It also increased demand for and use of health center for children with malaria. Concurrently, demand for CHWs' services diminished. User fees abolition and CCMm should be coordinated to maximize prompt access to treatment in rural areas.

Indexed as

Fees and ChargesAdolescentAntimalarialsBurkina FasoCase ManagementChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalariaMaleRural PopulationAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID26501561
PMCPMC4621040
OpenAlexW2204462542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.