Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26501395›Full record

ArticleNurse educator

Health Professions Education Research and the Institutional Review Board.

Mitchell T Heflin, Stephen DeMeo, Alisa Nagler, Marilyn J Hockenberry

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nurse educator. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mitchell T HeflinAuthor Affiliations: Associate Professor of Medicine and Senior Fellow (Dr Heflin), Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham; Neonatologist, WakeMed Health & Hospitals, Raleigh, and Adjunct Professor of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr DeMeo); Assistant Director for Accreditation (Dr Nagler), Validation and Credentialing, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois; and Bessie Baker Professor of Nursing and Associate Dean for Research (Dr Hockenberry), Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina.
Stephen DeMeo
Alisa Nagler
Marilyn J Hockenberry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth in health professions education (HPE) and a desire on the part of nurse and medical educators to disseminate their work have raised important questions about the ethical conduct of education research. At the center of the debate is the institutional review board (IRB) and its proper role in the oversight of HPE research. This article examines the IRB process and types of reviews for education research and presents an Education Project Summary Template to use for IRB reviews.

Indexed as

Ethics Committees, ResearchEthics, ResearchHealth OccupationsHumansNursing Education Research

Identifiers

PMID26501395
PMCPMC4764022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.