Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26501262›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2015

May the Best Molecule Win: Competition ESI Mass Spectrometry.

Sarah Laughlin, W David Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Photoelectron Spectroscopy of OHInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah LaughlinDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. slaughlin1@student.gsu.edu.
W David WilsonDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. wdw@gsu.edu.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

Molecular Design for Specific Recognition of Functional DNA SequencesR01GM111749 · NIGMS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, W DAVID · 2014 to 2021
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 111749NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry has become invaluable in the characterization of macromolecular biological systems such as nucleic acids and proteins. Recent advances in the field of mass spectrometry and the soft conditions characteristic of electrospray ionization allow for the investigation of non-covalent interactions among large biomolecules and ligands. Modulation of genetic processes through the use of small molecule inhibitors with the DNA minor groove is gaining attention as a potential therapeutic approach. In this review, we discuss the development of a competition method using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to probe the interactions of multiple DNA sequences with libraries of minor groove binding molecules. Such an approach acts as a high-throughput screening method to determine important information including the stoichiometry, binding mode, cooperativity, and relative binding affinity. In addition to small molecule-DNA complexes, we highlight other applications in which competition mass spectrometry has been used. A competitive approach to simultaneously investigate complex interactions promises to be a powerful tool in the discovery of small molecule inhibitors with high specificity and for specific, important DNA sequences.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNAHumansMass SpectrometrySpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationTranscription FactorsDNATranscription FactorscompetitionDNAelectrospraymass spectrometryminor groove binderspecificitytranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID26501262
PMCPMC4632762
OpenAlexW1928586799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.