Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26501228›Full record

SynthesisPsychological bulletin2015

Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories.

Melanie B Tannenbaum, Justin Hepler, Rick S Zimmerman, Lindsey Saul, Samantha Jacobs, Kristina Wilson, Dolores Albarracín

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04042246 (Knowledge on Vaccination Schedule and Full Immunization, and Its Effect on Vaccine Take-up in Jada Local Government Area in Adamawa State, Northeastern Nigeria), which is not on this map. Cited by 295 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
295citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04042246 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Knowledge on Vaccination Schedule and Full Immunization, and Its Effect on Vaccine Take-up in Jada Local Government Area in Adamawa State, Northeastern Nigeria

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled400ConditionsImmunization, Infection, Educational Problems, Information Seeking BehaviorArmsInformation Provision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

295 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Examining Spontaneous Cognitive and Emotional Reactions to Messages About Very Low Nicotine Cigarettes (VLNCs).Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Differential Responses to Cigarette Package Labeling Alternatives Among Adults Who Smoke: Results From a Randomized Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Combining Inserts With Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs to Promote Smoking Cessation: A 2-Week Randomized Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Mediational Effects on Motivation to Quit Smoking After Exposure to a Cigarette Pictorial Warning Label Among Young Adults.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

235 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melanie B TannenbaumDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.
Justin HeplerDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada.
Rick S ZimmermanCollege of Nursing, University of Missouri-St. Louis.
Lindsey SaulDepartment of Social and Behavioral Health, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Samantha JacobsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Health, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Kristina WilsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.
Dolores AlbarracínDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.

Funding

SELECTIVE EXPOSURE IN HIV PREVENTIONR01NR008325 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2002 to 2013
$4.5M
Efficacy and Effectiveness of Multi-Behavior Interventions Relevant to HIVR01MH094241 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
Online media and structural influences on new HIV/STI Cases in the US (2006-2020)R56AI114501 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2015 to 2015
$656k
NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI114501NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094241NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008325NINR NIH HHS R01 NR08325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fear appeals are a polarizing issue, with proponents confident in their efficacy and opponents confident that they backfire. We present the results of a comprehensive meta-analysis investigating fear appeals' effectiveness for influencing attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. We tested predictions from a large number of theories, the majority of which have never been tested meta-analytically until now. Studies were included if they contained a treatment group exposed to a fear appeal, a valid comparison group, a manipulation of depicted fear, a measure of attitudes, intentions, or behaviors concerning the targeted risk or recommended solution, and adequate statistics to calculate effect sizes. The meta-analysis included 127 articles (9% unpublished) yielding 248 independent samples (NTotal = 27,372) collected from diverse populations. Results showed a positive effect of fear appeals on attitudes, intentions, and behaviors, with the average effect on a composite index being random-effects d = 0.29. Moderation analyses based on prominent fear appeal theories showed that the effectiveness of fear appeals increased when the message included efficacy statements, depicted high susceptibility and severity, recommended one-time only (vs. repeated) behaviors, and targeted audiences that included a larger percentage of female message recipients. Overall, we conclude that (a) fear appeals are effective at positively influencing attitude, intentions, and behaviors; (b) there are very few circumstances under which they are not effective; and (c) there are no identified circumstances under which they backfire and lead to undesirable outcomes.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalPersuasive CommunicationAttitudeBehaviorFearFemaleHumansIntentionMaleRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26501228
PMCPMC5789790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.