ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2015
Cross-modal savings in the contralateral eyelid conditioned response.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurons of the inferior olive respond to broad classes of sensory input while subject to homeostatic control.The Journal of physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present experiment monitored bilateral eyelid responses during eyeblink conditioning in rats trained with a unilateral unconditioned stimulus (US). Three groups of rats were used to determine if cross-modal savings occurs when the location of the US is switched from one eye to the other. Rats in each group first received paired or unpaired eyeblink conditioning with a conditioned stimulus (tone or light; conditional stimulus [CS]) and a unilateral periorbital electrical stimulation US. All rats were subsequently given paired training, but with the US location (Group 1), CS modality (Group 2), or US location and CS modality (Group 3) changed. Changing the location of the US alone resulted in an immediate transfer of responding in both eyelids (Group 1) in rats that received paired training before the transfer session. Rats in Groups 2 and 3 that initially received paired training showed facilitated learning to the new CS modality during the transfer sessions, indicating that cross-modal savings occurs whether or not the location of the US is changed. All rats that were initially given unpaired training acquired conditioned eyeblink responses similar to de novo acquisition rate during the transfer sessions. Savings of CR incidence was more robust than savings of CR amplitude when the US switched sides, a finding that has implications for elucidating the neural mechanisms of cross-modal savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.