Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26501034›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Biomedical Biopolymers, their Origin and Evolution in Biomedical Sciences: A Systematic Review.

Preeti Yadav, Harsh Yadav, Veena Gowri Shah, Gaurav Shah, Gaurav Dhaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Preeti YadavSenior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, NIMS Dental College , Jaipur, Rajasthan, India .
Harsh YadavPrivate Practioner, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Gurgaon, Haryana, India .
Veena Gowri ShahReader, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, NIMS Dental College , Jaipur, Rajasthan, India .
Gaurav ShahReader, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, NIMS Dental College , Jaipur, Rajasthan, India .
Gaurav DhakaPrivate Practitioner, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopolymers provide a plethora of applications in the pharmaceutical and medical applications. A material that can be used for biomedical applications like wound healing, drug delivery and tissue engineering should possess certain properties like biocompatibility, biodegradation to non-toxic products, low antigenicity, high bio-activity, processability to complicated shapes with appropriate porosity, ability to support cell growth and proliferation and appropriate mechanical properties, as well as maintaining mechanical strength. This paper reviews biodegradable biopolymers focusing on their potential in biomedical applications. Biopolymers most commonly used and most abundantly available have been described with focus on the properties relevant to biomedical importance.

Indexed as

BiodegradableBiomedical applicationsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID26501034
PMCPMC4606363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.