ReviewJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015
Proposed Clinico-Pathological Classification for Oral Exophytic Lesions.
Review in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Current State of Clinical Diagnostic Algorithms for Mucosal Oral Lesions: A Scoping Review.Oral diseases · 2025Article
- Critical review of OCT in clinical practice for the assessment of oral lesions.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Development of a decision tree model for predicting the malignancy of localized gingival enlargements based on clinical characteristics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Oral verrucous carcinoma: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.Radiology and oncology · 2023Article
- Recurrent, oral cavity tumor-like exophytic lesions mimicking neoplastic disease in a patient with history of human papillomavirus-mediated squamous cell carcinoma.SAGE open medical case reports · 2021Article
- Dermoscopy of oral mucocele: three types of extravasation mucocelesTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Peripheral Exophytic Oral Lesions: A Clinical Decision Tree.International journal of dentistry · 2017Review
- Parosteal lipoma of the mandible: A case report and review of the literature.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral exophytic lesions often have proven to be diagnostically challenging due to the varied clinical presentation. The exophytic growth of the oral lesions is due to the type of pathology and histological changes. Careful clinical interpretation with a better histological understanding of exophytic lesions may ease the diagnosis from the differential diagnosis panel. The purpose of proposing classification system is to categorize the exophytic lesions of interest under specific clinical and/or histological explanation; and this will eventually lead to better understanding of the pathological condition that is described. To the best of our knowledge, there is no such classification system available for oral exophytic lesions and hence proposal of classification system is attempted in this study. Further, proposing a new classification system is not just to influence the academic contribution, but also to assist at greatest extent for diagnosis during clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.