ArticlePeerJ2015
Validation experiments on finite element models of an ostrich (Struthio camelus) cranium.
Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disparate feeding mechanics between two hadrosaurid dinosaurs support the potential for resource partitioning.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Quantitative investigation of pengornithid enantiornithine diet reveals macrocarnivorous ecology evolved in birds by Early Cretaceous.iScience · 2023Article
- Assessment of the mechanical role of cranial sutures in the mammalian skull: Computational biomechanical modelling of the rat skull.Journal of morphology · 2023Article
- Enhancing biomedical data validity with standardized segmentation finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Diet of Mesozoic toothed birds (Longipterygidae) inferred from quantitative analysis of extant avian diet proxies.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Modeling tooth enamel in FEA comparisons of skulls: Comparing common simplifications with biologically realistic models.iScience · 2021Article
- The diet of early birds based on modern and fossil evidence and a new framework for its reconstruction.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021Review
- Birds have peramorphic skulls, too: anatomical network analyses reveal oppositional heterochronies in avian skull evolution.Communications biology · 2020Article
- The use of extruded finite-element models as a novel alternative to tomography-based models: a case study using early mammal jaws.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
- Dietary niche and the evolution of cranial morphology in birds.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Dietary material properties shape cranial suture morphology in the mouse calvarium.Journal of anatomy · 2018Article
- Warped finite element models predict whole shell failure in turtle shells.Journal of anatomy · 2018Article
- Computational biomechanical analyses demonstrate similar shell-crushing abilities in modern and ancient arthropods.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018Article
- The biomechanical role of the chondrocranium and sutures in a lizard cranium.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Article
- The jaw is a second-class lever inPeerJ · 2017Article
- Building Finite Element Models to Investigate Zebrafish Jaw Biomechanics.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first finite element (FE) validation of a complete avian cranium was performed on an extant palaeognath, the ostrich (Struthio camelus). Ex-vivo strains were collected from the cranial bone and rhamphotheca. These experimental strains were then compared to convergence tested, specimen-specific finite element (FE) models. The FE models contained segmented cortical and trabecular bone, sutures and the keratinous rhamphotheca as identified from micro-CT scan data. Each of these individual materials was assigned isotropic material properties either from the literature or from nanoindentation, and the FE models compared to the ex-vivo results. The FE models generally replicate the location of peak strains and reflect the correct mode of deformation in the rostral region. The models are too stiff in regions of experimentally recorded high strain and too elastic in regions of low experimentally recorded low strain. The mode of deformation in the low strain neurocranial region is not replicated by the FE models, and although the models replicate strain orientations to within 10° in some regions, in most regions the correlation is not strong. Cranial sutures, as has previously been found in other taxa, are important for modifying both strain magnitude and strain patterns across the entire skull, but especially between opposing the sutural junctions. Experimentally, we find that the strains on the surface of the rhamphotheca are much lower than those found on nearby bone. The FE models produce much higher principal strains despite similar strain ratios across the entirety of the rhamphotheca. This study emphasises the importance of attempting to validate FE models, modelling sutures and rhamphothecae in birds, and shows that whilst location of peak strain and patterns of deformation can be modelled, replicating experimental data in digital models of avian crania remains problematic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.