Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26500660›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Bacterial endophytes from wild maize suppress Fusarium graminearum in modern maize and inhibit mycotoxin accumulation.

Walaa K Mousa, Charles R Shearer, Victor Limay-Rios, Ting Zhou, Manish N Raizada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Maize seed endophytes.Molecular plant pathology · 2023
    Review
  8. Biocontrol Potential ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fusaricidins, Polymyxins and Volatiles Produced byPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Changes in Bacterial Endophyte Community FollowingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Walaa K MousaDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Guelph, ON, Canada ; Department of Pharmacognosy, Mansoura University Mansoura, Egypt.
Charles R ShearerDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Guelph, ON, Canada.
Victor Limay-RiosDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown, ON, Canada.
Ting ZhouGuelph Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Guelph, ON, Canada.
Manish N RaizadaDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Guelph, ON, Canada.
University of Guelph · CAAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild maize (teosinte) has been reported to be less susceptible to pests than their modern maize (corn) relatives. Endophytes, defined as microbes that inhabit plants without causing disease, are known for their ability to antagonize plant pests and pathogens. We hypothesized that the wild relatives of modern maize may host endophytes that combat pathogens. Fusarium graminearum is the fungus that causes Gibberella Ear Rot (GER) in modern maize and produces the mycotoxin, deoxynivalenol (DON). In this study, 215 bacterial endophytes, previously isolated from diverse maize genotypes including wild teosintes, traditional landraces and modern varieties, were tested for their ability to antagonize F. graminearum in vitro. Candidate endophytes were then tested for their ability to suppress GER in modern maize in independent greenhouse trials. The results revealed that three candidate endophytes derived from wild teosintes were most potent in suppressing F. graminearum in vitro and GER in a modern maize hybrid. These wild teosinte endophytes could suppress a broad spectrum of fungal pathogens of modern crops in vitro. The teosinte endophytes also suppressed DON mycotoxin during storage to below acceptable safety threshold levels. A fourth, less robust anti-fungal strain was isolated from a modern maize hybrid. Three of the anti-fungal endophytes were predicted to be Paenibacillus polymyxa, along with one strain of Citrobacter. Microscopy studies suggested a fungicidal mode of action by all four strains. Molecular and biochemical studies showed that the P. polymyxa strains produced the previously characterized anti-Fusarium compound, fusaricidin. Our results suggest that the wild relatives of modern crops may serve as a valuable reservoir for endophytes in the ongoing fight against serious threats to modern agriculture. We discuss the possible impact of crop evolution and domestication on endophytes in the context of plant defense.

Indexed as

deoxynivalenolendophyteFusarium graminearumGibberella ear rotmaizePaenibacillusparviglumisZea diploperennis

Identifiers

PMID26500660
PMCPMC4593954
OpenAlexW1826789375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.