Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26500623›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

New strategic insights into managing fungal biofilms.

Elisa Borghi, Giulia Morace, Francesca Borgo, Ranjith Rajendran, Leighann Sherry, Christopher Nile, Gordon Ramage

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antifungal Activity of the Extract of a Macroalgae,Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mechanistic Understanding ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Methidathion Poisoning.Korean journal of critical care medicine · 2017
    Article
  14. Biofilm Formation byFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisa BorghiLaboratory of Microbiology, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy.
Giulia MoraceLaboratory of Microbiology, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy.
Francesca BorgoLaboratory of Microbiology, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy.
Ranjith RajendranInfection and Immunity Research Group, Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, UK.
Leighann SherryInfection and Immunity Research Group, Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, UK.
Christopher NileInfection and Immunity Research Group, Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, UK.
Gordon RamageInfection and Immunity Research Group, Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, UK.
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal infections have dramatically increased in the last decades in parallel with an increase of populations with impaired immunity, resulting from medical conditions such as cancer, transplantation, or other chronic diseases. Such opportunistic infections result from a complex relationship between fungi and host, and can range from self-limiting to chronic or life-threatening infections. Modern medicine, characterized by a wide use of biomedical devices, offers new niches for fungi to colonize and form biofilm communities. The capability of fungi to form biofilms is well documented and associated with increased drug tolerance and resistance. In addition, biofilm formation facilitates persistence in the host promoting a persistent inflammatory condition. With a limited availability of antifungals within our arsenal, new therapeutic approaches able to address both host and pathogenic factors that promote fungal disease progression, i.e., chronic inflammation and biofilm formation, could represent an advantage in the clinical setting. In this paper we discuss the antifungal properties of myriocin, fulvic acid, and acetylcholine in light of their already known anti-inflammatory activity and as candidate dual action therapeutics to treat opportunistic fungal infections.

Indexed as

acetylcholineantifungal resistancebiofilm-related infectionsfulvic acidmyriocin

Identifiers

PMID26500623
PMCPMC4594024
OpenAlexW2113213558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.