Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26500529›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2015

An algorithm to predict the connectome of neural microcircuits.

Michael W Reimann, James G King, Eilif B Muller, Srikanth Ramaswamy, Henry Markram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Large-Scale Mechanistic Models of Brain Circuits with Biophysically and Morphologically Detailed Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael W ReimannBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Biotech Campus Geneva, Switzerland.
James G KingBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Biotech Campus Geneva, Switzerland.
Eilif B MullerBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Biotech Campus Geneva, Switzerland.
Srikanth RamaswamyBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Biotech Campus Geneva, Switzerland.
Henry MarkramBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Biotech Campus Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimentally mapping synaptic connections, in terms of the numbers and locations of their synapses and estimating connection probabilities, is still not a tractable task, even for small volumes of tissue. In fact, the six layers of the neocortex contain thousands of unique types of synaptic connections between the many different types of neurons, of which only a handful have been characterized experimentally. Here we present a theoretical framework and a data-driven algorithmic strategy to digitally reconstruct the complete synaptic connectivity between the different types of neurons in a small well-defined volume of tissue-the micro-scale connectome of a neural microcircuit. By enforcing a set of established principles of synaptic connectivity, and leveraging interdependencies between fundamental properties of neural microcircuits to constrain the reconstructed connectivity, the algorithm yields three parameters per connection type that predict the anatomy of all types of biologically viable synaptic connections. The predictions reproduce a spectrum of experimental data on synaptic connectivity not used by the algorithm. We conclude that an algorithmic approach to the connectome can serve as a tool to accelerate experimental mapping, indicating the minimal dataset required to make useful predictions, identifying the datasets required to improve their accuracy, testing the feasibility of experimental measurements, and making it possible to test hypotheses of synaptic connectivity.

Indexed as

algorithm developmentconnectome mappingcortical circuitsin siliconeocortexsomatosensory cortexsynaptic transmission

Identifiers

PMID26500529
PMCPMC4597796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.