Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26500325›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

The association between symptoms and bladder or renal tract cancer in primary care: a systematic review.

Mia Schmidt-Hansen, Sabine Berendse, William Hamilton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Risk prediction models for symptomatic patients with bladder and kidney cancer: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Weight loss as a predictor of cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hematuria in aging men with hemophilia: Association with factor prophylaxis.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mia Schmidt-HansenNational Collaborating Centre for Cancer, Cardiff.
Sabine BerendseNational Collaborating Centre for Cancer, Cardiff.
William HamiltonUniversity of Exeter medical School, Exeter.
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate selection for further investigation of patients presenting in primary care with symptoms that may indicate cancer is key to early diagnosis.

aimTo quantify the risk of urinary tract cancer in patients presenting in primary care with symptoms that may indicate bladder or renal cancer. DESIGN AND

settingSystematic review of studies relating to bladder or renal cancer in primary care.

methodDatabases searched were MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science (SCI and SSCI), and ISI Proceedings from 1980 to August 2014, and PsycINFO (1980-2012) and BioMed Central (inception to 2012) for retrospective, prospective, or case-control diagnostic accuracy studies of symptomatic patients presenting to primary care with one or more symptoms for whom follow-up data were available. The target conditions were bladder or renal cancer. The studies were appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool.

resultsEleven studies with 3 451 675 patients were included. The positive predictive value (PPV) from meta-analysis of visible haematuria was 5.1% in adult patients. It increased with age and was higher in males. The PPVs of other single symptoms were very low, with the highest non-haematuria PPV being 1.4% for anaemia in males. Fewer data were available on the PPVs of symptom combinations. Generally, these data showed that, with the exception of symptom combinations including haematuria, these were very low.

conclusionThe only high-risk feature of bladder/renal cancer in primary care was visible haematuria, and this clearly warrants investigation. However, not all patients with one of these cancers experience haematuria, so a policy restricting investigation to patients with haematuria will inevitably delay the diagnosis in some patients.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionPrimary Health CareDelayed DiagnosisDiagnosis, DifferentialHematuriaHumansKidney NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk FactorsUrinary Bladder Neoplasmsbladder neoplasmsdiagnosishaematuriaprimary carerenal neoplasmssymptoms

Identifiers

PMID26500325
PMCPMC4617272
OpenAlexW2220451193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.