Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26500321›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

GPs' perspectives on secondary cardiovascular prevention in older age: a focus group study in the Netherlands.

Petra G van Peet, Yvonne M Drewes, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Wouter de Ruijter

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deprescribing preventive medication in older patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petra G van PeetDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Yvonne M DrewesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jacobijn GusseklooDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Wouter de RuijterDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough guidelines recommend secondary cardiovascular prevention irrespective of age, in older age the uptake of treatment is lower than in younger age groups.

aimTo explore the dilemmas GPs in the Netherlands encounter when implementing guidelines for secondary cardiovascular prevention in older age. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study in four focus groups consisting of GPs (n = 23, from the northern part of the province South Holland) and a fifth focus group consisting of GP trainees (n = 4, from the Leiden University Medical Center).

methodFocus group discussions were organised to elicit perspectives on the implementation of secondary cardiovascular prevention for older people. The 14 theoretical domains of the refined Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) were used for (deductive) coding of the focus group discussions. The coded texts were analysed, content was discussed, and barriers and facilitators were identified for each domain of the TDF.

resultsThe main theme that emerged was 'uncertainty'. Identified barriers were guideline-related, patient-related, and organisation-related. Identified facilitators were doctor-related, patient-related, and organisation-related. The main aim of secondary preventive treatment was improvement in quality of life.

conclusionGPs in the Netherlands are uncertain about many aspects of secondary cardiovascular prevention in older age; the guidelines themselves, their own role, patient factors, and the organisation of care. In view of this uncertainty, GPs consciously weigh all aspects of the situation in close dialogue with the individual patient, with the ultimate aim of improving quality of life. This highly-individualised care may largely explain the reduced prescription rates.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PractitionersSecondary PreventionAgedCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleFocus GroupsGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Qualitative ResearchQuality of Lifecardiovasculargeneral practiceguidelines as topicolder agesecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID26500321
PMCPMC4617268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.