Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26500315›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

Access to general practice in England: time for a policy rethink.

Julian M Simpson, Kath Checkland, Stephanie Snow, Jennifer Voorhees, Katy Rothwell, Aneez Esmail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. What patients want from access to UK general practice: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A paradox of problems in accessing general practice: a qualitative participatory case study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  10. GPs' views of health policy changes: a qualitative 'netnography' study of UK general practice online magazine commentary.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Access to general practice in England: political, theoretical, and empirical considerations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  13. Access to primary care: creative solutions are needed.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian M SimpsonCentre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, the University of Manchester, Manchester.
Kath ChecklandProfessor of Health Policy and Primary Care, the University of Manchester, Manchester.
Stephanie SnowCentre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, the University of Manchester, Manchester.
Jennifer VoorheesCentre for Primary Care, the University of Manchester.
Katy RothwellNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC), Greater Manchester, Salford.
Aneez EsmailThe University of Manchester, Manchester.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health PolicyEnglandGeneral PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumans

Identifiers

PMID26500315
PMCPMC4617262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.