Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26500249›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2015

Developing the eHistology Atlas.

Lorna Richardson, Liz Graham, Julie Moss, Nick Burton, Yogmatee Roochun, Chris Armit, Richard A Baldock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lorna RichardsonMRC Human Genetics Unit, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Liz GrahamMRC Human Genetics Unit, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Julie MossMRC Human Genetics Unit, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nick BurtonMRC Human Genetics Unit, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Yogmatee RoochunMRC Human Genetics Unit, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Chris ArmitMRC Human Genetics Unit, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Richard A BaldockMRC Human Genetics Unit, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK richard.baldock@igmm.ed.ac.uk.

Funding

GUDMAP- Database and WebsiteU01DK092983 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH · PI BALDOCK, RICHARD ALAN · 2011 to 2016
$3.2M
Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127527203Medical Research Council U.1275.2.4.4.1NIDDK NIH HHS DK092983NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK092983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eMouseAtlas project has undertaken to generate a new resource providing access to high-resolution colour images of the slides used in the renowned textbook 'The Atlas of Mouse Development' by Matthew H. Kaufman. The original histology slides were digitized, and the associated anatomy annotations captured for display in the new resource. These annotations were assigned to objects in the standard reference anatomy ontology, allowing the eHistology resource to be linked to other data resources including the Edinburgh Mouse Atlas Gene-Expression database (EMAGE) an the Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) gene-expression database (GXD). The provision of the eHistology Atlas resource was assisted greatly by the expertise of the eMouseAtlas project in delivering large image datasets within a web environment, using IIP3D technology. This technology also permits future extensions to the resource through the addition of further layers of data and annotations to the resource. Database URL: www.emouseatlas.org/emap/eHistology/index.php.

Indexed as

Anatomy, ArtisticAtlases as TopicHistologyInternetAnimalsMice

Identifiers

PMID26500249
PMCPMC4618478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.