ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016
Sensitive Detection of Mono- and Polyclonal ESR1 Mutations in Primary Tumors, Metastatic Lesions, and Cell-Free DNA of Breast Cancer Patients.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
126 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 203 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for pre-analytical conditions for assessing the methylation of circulating cell-free DNA.Clinical epigenetics · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Accuracy of analysis of cfDNA for detection of single nucleotide variants and copy number variants in breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Liquid biopsy prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis, cancer recurrence, and patient survival in breast cancer: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Clinical factors associated with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in primary breast cancer.Molecular oncology · 2019Trial
- Heterogeneity and clinical significance of ESR1 mutations in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer patients receiving fulvestrant.Nature communications · 2016Trial
- Standardized Analytical Verification of ctDNA ESR1 Mutation Testing in Metastatic HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: A European Multicentre Study Using dPCR and NGS-Based Liquid Biopsy.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Article
- ExtremeResearch square · 2026Article
- Cutting-edge advances in endocrine therapy for breast cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- RET signaling as a mediator of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer brain metastasis.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Activating mutations in ESR1 contribute to an immunosuppressive breast tumor microenvironment by dampening cytokine secretion.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes of Elacestrant in ER+, HER2-, ESR1-Mutant Metastatic Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- The natural L370F ERα variant confers endocrine resistance and sensitivity to ATRA in metastatic breast cancer cells.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Multi-analyte approach combining cfDNA sequencing and protein testing for early ovarian cancer detection.iScience · 2025Article
- Tissue-based genomic profiling of 300,000 tumors highlights the detection of variants with low allele fraction.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Detection ofCancers · 2025Article
- Current Trends in Liquid Biopsy Tracking Resistance in Molecular Breast Cancer-Targeted Therapies.Genes · 2025Review
- Serial analysis ofFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Decoding estrogen receptor and GPER biology: structural insights and therapeutic advances in ERα-positive breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy for breast cancer and other solid tumors: a review of recent advances.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Review
66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGiven the clinical relevance of ESR1 mutations as potential drivers of resistance to endocrine therapy, this study used sensitive detection methods to determine the frequency of ESR1 mutations in primary and metastatic breast cancer, and in cell-free DNA (cfDNA). EXPERIMENTAL
designSix ESR1 mutations (K303R, S463P, Y537C, Y537N, Y537S, D538G) were assessed by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), with lower limits of detection of 0.05% to 0.16%, in primary tumors (n = 43), bone (n = 12) and brain metastases (n = 38), and cfDNA (n = 29). Correlations between ESR1 mutations in metastatic lesions and single (1 patient) or serial blood draws (4 patients) were assessed.
resultsESR1 mutations were detected for D538G (n = 13), Y537S (n = 3), and Y537C (n = 1), and not for K303R, S463P, or Y537N. Mutation rates were 7.0% (3/43 primary tumors), 9.1% (1/11 bone metastases), 12.5% (3/24 brain metastases), and 24.1% (7/29 cfDNA). Two patients showed polyclonal disease with more than one ESR1 mutation. Mutation allele frequencies were 0.07% to 0.2% in primary tumors, 1.4% in bone metastases, 34.3% to 44.9% in brain metastases, and 0.2% to 13.7% in cfDNA. In cases with both cfDNA and metastatic samples (n = 5), mutations were detected in both (n = 3) or in cfDNA only (n = 2). Treatment was associated with changes in ESR1 mutation detection and allele frequency.
conclusionsESR1 mutations were detected at very low allele frequencies in some primary breast cancers, and at high allele frequency in metastases, suggesting that in some tumors rare ESR1-mutant clones are enriched by endocrine therapy. Further studies should address whether sensitive detection of ESR1 mutations in primary breast cancer and in serial blood draws may be predictive for development of resistant disease. See related commentary by Gu and Fuqua, p. 1034.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.