Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26499835›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2015

Relevance Rank Platform (RRP) for Functional Filtering of High Content Protein-Protein Interaction Data.

Yuba Raj Pokharel, Jani Saarela, Agnieszka Szwajda, Christian Rupp, Anne Rokka, Shibendra Lal Kumar Karna, Kaisa Teittinen, Garry Corthals, Olli Kallioniemi, Krister Wennerberg and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuba Raj PokharelFrom the ‡Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland; §Centre for Biotechnology, ‖Faculty of Life Science and Biotechnology, South Asian University, New Delhi 110021, India;
Jani SaarelaFrom the ‡Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland;
Agnieszka SzwajdaFrom the ‡Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland;
Christian Rupp§Centre for Biotechnology.
Anne Rokka§Centre for Biotechnology.
Shibendra Lal Kumar Karna
Kaisa Teittinen**Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology (BioMediTech), University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, FIN-33014, Tampere, Finland.
Garry Corthals§Centre for Biotechnology.
Olli KallioniemiFrom the ‡Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland;
Krister WennerbergFrom the ‡Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland;
Tero AittokallioFrom the ‡Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland;
Jukka WestermarckFrom the ‡Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland; §Centre for Biotechnology, ¶Department of Pathology,University of Turku and Åbo Akademi, Turku, Finland, PO Box 123, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland.; jukwes@utu.fi.
University of Helsinki · FISouth Asian University · INTampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High content protein interaction screens have revolutionized our understanding of protein complex assembly. However, one of the major challenges in translation of high content protein interaction data is identification of those interactions that are functionally relevant for a particular biological question. To address this challenge, we developed a relevance ranking platform (RRP), which consist of modular functional and bioinformatic filters to provide relevance rank among the interactome proteins. We demonstrate the versatility of RRP to enable a systematic prioritization of the most relevant interaction partners from high content data, highlighted by the analysis of cancer relevant protein interactions for oncoproteins Pin1 and PME-1. We validated the importance of selected interactions by demonstration of PTOV1 and CSKN2B as novel regulators of Pin1 target c-Jun phosphorylation and reveal previously unknown interacting proteins that may mediate PME-1 effects via PP2A-inhibition. The RRP framework is modular and can be modified to answer versatile research problems depending on the nature of the biological question under study. Based on comparison of RRP to other existing filtering tools, the presented data indicate that RRP offers added value especially for the analysis of interacting proteins for which there is no sufficient prior knowledge available. Finally, we encourage the use of RRP in combination with either SAINT or CRAPome computational tools for selecting the candidate interactors that fulfill the both important requirements, functional relevance, and high confidence interaction detection.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCarboxylic Ester HydrolasesCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl IsomerasePeptidylprolyl IsomerasePhosphorylationProtein Interaction MappingProtein Phosphatase 2ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBiomarkers, TumorCarboxylic Ester HydrolasesNeoplasm ProteinsNIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl IsomerasePeptidylprolyl IsomerasePIN1 protein, humanProtein Phosphatase 2protein phosphatase methylesterase-1ProteinsPTOV1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26499835
PMCPMC4762622
OpenAlexW2174161086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.