ArticleeLife2015
Nonlinear circuits for naturalistic visual motion estimation.
Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fly navigational responses exploit plume-specific odor motion and gradient cues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Dynamic trajectory cues drive sequenced integration in approach detectors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Humans can use positive and negative spectrotemporal correlations to detect rising and falling pitch.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Broken time-reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- A recurrent neural circuit in Drosophila temporally sharpens visual inputs.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- A Bio-Inspired Visual Neural Model for Robustly and Steadily Detecting Motion Directions of Translating Objects Against Variable Contrast in the Figure-Ground and Noise Interference.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Humans can use positive and negative spectrotemporal correlations to detect rising and falling pitch.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Optimization in Visual Motion Estimation.Annual review of vision science · 2024Review
- Broken time reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A recurrent neural circuit inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Direct comparison reveals algorithmic similarities in fly and mouse visual motion detection.iScience · 2023Article
- Spatiotemporal visual statistics of aquatic environments in the natural habitats of zebrafish.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Shallow neural networks trained to detect collisions recover features of visual loom-selective neurons.eLife · 2022Article
- Predicting individual neuron responses with anatomically constrained task optimization.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- Predictive encoding of motion begins in the primate retina.Nature neuroscience · 2021Article
- Maximally efficient prediction in the early fly visual system may support evasive flight maneuvers.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Mechanism for analogous illusory motion perception in flies and humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Global Motion Processing by Populations of Direction-Selective Retinal Ganglion Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- A Neural Representation of Naturalistic Motion-Guided Behavior in the Zebrafish Brain.Current biology : CB · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many animals use visual signals to estimate motion. Canonical models suppose that animals estimate motion by cross-correlating pairs of spatiotemporally separated visual signals, but recent experiments indicate that humans and flies perceive motion from higher-order correlations that signify motion in natural environments. Here we show how biologically plausible processing motifs in neural circuits could be tuned to extract this information. We emphasize how known aspects of Drosophila's visual circuitry could embody this tuning and predict fly behavior. We find that segregating motion signals into ON/OFF channels can enhance estimation accuracy by accounting for natural light/dark asymmetries. Furthermore, a diversity of inputs to motion detecting neurons can provide access to more complex higher-order correlations. Collectively, these results illustrate how non-canonical computations improve motion estimation with naturalistic inputs. This argues that the complexity of the fly's motion computations, implemented in its elaborate circuits, represents a valuable feature of its visual motion estimator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.