Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26499473›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2015

Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study.

Prabhjot Juneja, Andrew Kneebone, Jeremy T Booth, David I Thwaites, Ramandeep Kaur, Emma Colvill, Jin A Ng, Paul J Keall, Thomas Eade

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02212548 (Prostate-Rectal Separation With PEG Hydrogel and Its Effect on Decreasing Rectal Dose), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02212548 nacompletednot on this map

Prostate-Rectal Separation With PEG Hydrogel and Its Effect on Decreasing Rectal Dose

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal North Shore HospitalRan2012 to 2016Enrolled30ConditionsCancer of the ProstateArmsPEG Hydrogel (SpaceOAR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of rectal displacement devices in managing prostate motion: a systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical effects of rectal retractor application in prostate cancer radiotherapy.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. respiTrack: Patient-specific real-time respiratory tumor motion prediction using magnetic tracking.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Prabhjot JunejaNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia. prabhjot@physics.usyd.edu.au.
Andrew KneeboneNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia. Andrew.Kneebone@health.nsw.gov.au.
Jeremy T BoothNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia. Jeremy.Booth@health.nsw.gov.au.
David I ThwaitesInstitute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. david.thwaites@sydney.edu.au.
Ramandeep Kaur, 5/161A Willoughby Road, Naremburn, NSW, 2065, Australia. kaurramandeep@hotmail.co.uk.
Emma ColvillNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia. emma.colvill@sydney.edu.au.
Jin A NgRadiation Physics Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. jin.aun@sydney.edu.au.
Paul J KeallRadiation Physics Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. paul.keall@sydney.edu.au.
Thomas EadeNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia. Thomas.Eade@health.nsw.gov.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe use of a tissue expander (hydrogel) for sparing of the rectum from increased irradiation during prostate radiotherapy is becoming popular. The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of a tissue expander (hydrogel) on the intrafraction prostate motion during radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Real time prostate motion was analysed for 26 patients and 742 fractions; 12 patients with and 14 patients without hydrogel (SpaceOAR™). The intra-fraction motion was quantified and compared between the two groups.

resultsThe average (±standard deviation) of the mean motion during the treatment for patients with and without hydrogel was 1.5 (±0.8 mm) and 1.1 (±0.9 mm) respectively (p < 0.05). The average time of motion >3 mm for patients with and without hydrogel was 7.7 % (±1.1 %) and 4.5 % (±0.9 %) respectively (p > 0.05). The hydrogel age, fraction number and treatment time were found to have no effect (R (2)  < 0.05) on the prostate motion.

conclusionsDifferences in intrafraction motion in patients with hydrogel and without hydrogel were within measurement uncertainty (<1 mm). This result confirms that the addition of a spacer does not negate the need for intrafraction motion management if clinically indicated.

Indexed as

Tissue Expansion DevicesHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMaleMotionProstatic NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID26499473
PMCPMC4619294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.