Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26499452›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2015

Quantification of confocal fluorescence microscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Fahime Sheikhzadeh, Rabab K Ward, Anita Carraro, Zhao Yang Chen, Dirk van Niekerk, Dianne Miller, Tom Ehlen, Calum E MacAulay, Michele Follen, Pierre M Lane and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cervical Cancer Screening Revolution: Advancements with Confocal Endomicroscopy.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Optical techniques for cervical neoplasia detection.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fahime SheikhzadehImaging Unit, Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada. fsheikhzad@bccrc.ca.
Rabab K WardDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. rababw@ece.ubc.ca.
Anita CarraroImaging Unit, Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada. acarraro@bccrc.ca.
Zhao Yang ChenImaging Unit, Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada. zchen@bccrc.ca.
Dirk van NiekerkDepartment of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada. dvanniek@bccancer.bc.ca.
Dianne MillerDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. Dianne.Miller@vch.ca.
Tom EhlenDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. Thomas.Ehlen@vch.ca.
Calum E MacAulayImaging Unit, Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada. cmacaul@bccrc.ca.
Michele FollenBrookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, 11212, USA. michelefollen@hotmail.com.
Pierre M LaneImaging Unit, Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada. plane@bccrc.ca.
Martial GuillaudImaging Unit, Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada. mguillau@bccrc.ca.
Occupational Cancer Research Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CABC Cancer Agency · CABrookdale University Hospital and Medical Center · US

Funding

Technical FeasibilityP01CA082710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GUILLAUD, MARTIAL · 1999 to 2014
$28.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01-CA-82710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer remains a major health problem, especially in developing countries. Colposcopic examination is used to detect high-grade lesions in patients with a history of abnormal pap smears. New technologies are needed to improve the sensitivity and specificity of this technique. We propose to test the potential of fluorescence confocal microscopy to identify high-grade lesions.

methodsWe examined the quantification of ex vivo confocal fluorescence microscopy to differentiate among normal cervical tissue, low-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN), and high-grade CIN. We sought to (1) quantify nuclear morphology and tissue architecture features by analyzing images of cervical biopsies; and (2) determine the accuracy of high-grade CIN detection via confocal microscopy relative to the accuracy of detection by colposcopic impression. Forty-six biopsies obtained from colposcopically normal and abnormal cervical sites were evaluated. Confocal images were acquired at different depths from the epithelial surface and histological images were analyzed using in-house software.

resultsThe features calculated from the confocal images compared well with those features obtained from the histological images and histopathological reviews of the specimens (obtained by a gynecologic pathologist). The correlations between two of these features (the nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio and the average of three nearest Delaunay-neighbors distance) and the grade of dysplasia were higher than that of colposcopic impression. The sensitivity of detecting high-grade dysplasia by analysing images collected at the surface of the epithelium, and at 15 and 30 μm below the epithelial surface were respectively 100, 100, and 92 %.

conclusionsQuantitative analysis of confocal fluorescence images showed its capacity for discriminating high-grade CIN lesions vs. low-grade CIN lesions and normal tissues, at different depth of imaging. This approach could be used to help clinicians identify high-grade CIN in clinical settings.

Indexed as

AdultColposcopyFemaleHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPhenotypeUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26499452
PMCPMC4619300
OpenAlexW2112395929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.