ReviewMagnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America2015
Magnetic Resonance-Guided Passive Catheter Tracking for Endovascular Therapy.
Review in Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current State of MRI-Guided Endovascular Arterial Interventions: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Pooled it
- MR-Guidance of Gene Therapy for Brain Diseases: Moving From Palliative Treatment to Cures.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- 3D printed vitamin D impregnated catheters for magnetic resonance-guided interventions: proof of concept and imaging characteristics.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based temporal MR image reconstruction for accelerated interventional imaging during in-bore biopsies.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Interventional device tracking under MRI via alternating current controlled inhomogeneities.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- An interventional MRI guidewire combining profile and tip conspicuity for catheterization at 0.55T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- MRI-guided endovascular intervention: current methods and future potential.Expert review of medical devices · 2022Review
- Optimised passive marker device visibility and automatic marker detection for 3-T MRI-guided endovascular interventions: a pulsatile flow phantom study.European radiology experimental · 2022Article
- Real-time CMR guidance for intracardiac and great vessel pressure mapping in patients with congenital heart disease using an MR conditional guidewire-results of 25 patients.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021Article
- Development of an MRI-Guided Approach to Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Using Holmium-166 Microspheres.Cancers · 2021Article
- A 20-gauge active needle design with thin-film printed circuitry for interventional MRI at 0.55T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of MR guidance for endovascular intervention is appealing because of its lack of ionizing radiation, high-contrast visualization of vessel walls and adjacent soft tissues, multiplanar capabilities, and potential to incorporate functional information such as flow, fluid dynamics, perfusion, and cardiac motion. This review highlights state-of-the-art imaging techniques and hardware used for passive tracking of endovascular devices in interventional MR imaging, including negative contrast, passive contrast, nonproton multispectral, and direct current techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of passive tracking relative to active tracking are also summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.