Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26499256›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2015

The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the PAtient-Centred Team (PACT) model: study protocol of a prospective matched control before-and-after study.

Trine S Bergmo, Gro K Berntsen, Monika Dalbakk, Markus Rumpsfeld

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02541474 (Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Teamwork in Medical Emergencies), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02541474 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Teamwork in Medical Emergencies: The PAtient-Centred Team (PACT) Service Model. Effect and Cost Effectiveness Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of North NorwayRan2016 to 2018Enrolled1,200ConditionsFrail Elderly w/ Multimorbidity & Functional LimitationsArmsIntegrated care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Trine S BergmoNorwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038, Tromsø, Norway. trine.bergmo@telemed.no.
Gro K BerntsenNorwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038, Tromsø, Norway. gro.berntsen@telemed.no.
Monika DalbakkDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. monika.marie.dalbakk@unn.no.
Markus RumpsfeldDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. markus.rumpsfeld@unn.no.
University Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study protocol describes the evaluation of a comprehensive integrated care model implemented at two hospital sites at the University Hospital of North Norway (UNN). The PAtient Centred Team (PACT) model includes proactive, patient-centred interdisciplinary teams that aim to improve the continuum and quality of care of frail elderly patients and reduce health care costs. The main objectives of the evaluation are to analyse the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of using patient-centred teams as part of routine service provision for this patient group. The evaluation will analyse the effect on patient health and functional status, patient experiences and hospital utilisation, and it will conduct an economic evaluation. This paper describes the PACT model and the rationale for and design of the planned effectiveness and cost-effectiveness study. METHODS/

designThis is a prospective, non-randomised matched control before-and-after intervention study. Patients in the intervention group will be recruited from the hospital sites that have implemented the PACT model. The controls will be recruited from two hospitals without the model. The control patients and the index patients will be matched according to sex, age and number of long-term conditions. The study aims to include 600 patients in each group, which will provide sufficient power to detect a clinical change in the primary outcome. The primary outcome is the physical dimension of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Secondary outcomes are the Patient Generated Index (PGI), the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC), hospitalisation and length of stay. The cost-effectiveness study takes a health provider perspective and calculates the cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The data will be collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The data will be analysed using techniques and models that recognise the lack of randomisation and the correlation of cost and effect data. DISCUSSION: The study results will provide knowledge about whether the integrated care model implemented at UNN improves the quality of care for the frail elderly with multiple conditions. The study will establish whether the PAC. T model improves health and functional status and is cost effective compared to the usual care for this patient group.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02541474.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFrail ElderlyHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient-Centered CareProspective StudiesQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

PMID26499256
PMCPMC4619094
OpenAlexW2096785416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.