Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26499191›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2015

Differential item functioning (DIF) of SF-12 and Q-LES-Q-SF items among french substance users.

Stéphanie Bourion-Bédès, Raymund Schwan, Vincent Laprevote, Alex Bédès, Jean-Louis Bonnet, Cédric Baumann

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A comparison of methods to address item non-response when testing for differential item functioning in multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Factor structure of the Q-LES-Q short form in an enrolled mental health clinic population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Examining gender-related differential item functioning of the Veterans Rand 12-item Health Survey.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Stéphanie Bourion-BédèsService Médico Psychologique Régional, 57 073, Metz, France. steph_bedes@yahoo.fr.
Raymund SchwanCSAPA (Health Care Centre of Accompaniment and Prevention in Addictology), University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France. raymund.schwan@univ-lorraine.fr.
Vincent LaprevoteCSAPA (Health Care Centre of Accompaniment and Prevention in Addictology), University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Alex BédèsANPAA 15- CSAPA (Health Care Centre of Accompaniment and Prevention in Addictology), Saint-Flour, Cantal, France. bedesams@club-internet.fr.
Jean-Louis BonnetANPAA 15- CSAPA (Health Care Centre of Accompaniment and Prevention in Addictology), Aurillac, Cantal, France.
Cédric BaumannEA4360 APEMAC, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France. c.baumann@chu-nancy.fr.
Centre d’Investigation Clinique Innovation Technologique de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRScience Club · USYahoo (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferential Item Functioning (DIF) is investigated to ensure that each item displays a consistent pattern of responses irrespective of the characteristics of the respondents. Assessing DIF helps to understand the nature of instruments, to assess the quality of a measure and to interpret results. This study aimed to examine whether the items of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) exhibit DIF.

methodA total of 124 outpatients diagnosed with substance dependence participated in a cross-sectional, multicenter study. In addition to the Q-LES-Q-SF and SF-12 results, demographic data such as age, sex, type of substance dependence and education level were collected. Rasch analysis was conducted (using RUMM2020 software) to assess DIF of the Q-LES-Q-SF and SF-12 items.

resultsFor SF-12, significant age-related uniform DIF was found in two of the 12 items, and sex-related DIF was found in one of the 12 items. All of the observed DIF effects in SF-12 were found among the mental health items. Three items showed DIF on the Q-LES-Q-SF; however, the impact of DIF item on the delta score calculation for the comparisons of self-reported health status between the groups was minimal in the SF-12 and small in the Q-LES-Q-SF.

conclusionThese results indicated that no major measurement bias affects the validity of the self-reported health status assessed using the Q-LES-Q-SF or SF-12. Thus, these questionnaires are largely robust measures of self-reported health status among substance users.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26499191
PMCPMC4619284
OpenAlexW2155752713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.