Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26499113›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2015

Knowledge of stroke a study from a sex perspective.

José M Ramírez-Moreno, Rafael Alonso-González, Diego Peral-Pacheco, María Victoria Millán-Núñez, José J Aguirre-Sánchez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sex and gender-related differences in neurological diseases: current challenges and recommendations for clinical practice.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

José M Ramírez-MorenoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Avda de Elvas s/n, 06080, Badajoz, Spain. j.ramrez@gmail.com.
Rafael Alonso-GonzálezAdult Congenital Heart Centre and Centre for Pulmonary Hypertension, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK. r.alonso@rbht.nhs.uk.
Diego Peral-PachecoDepartment of History and Bioethics, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain. diego@unex.es.
María Victoria Millán-NúñezDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain. victoria.minu@hotmail.com.
José J Aguirre-SánchezDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Avda de Elvas s/n, 06080, Badajoz, Spain. josejavieraguirre@jjneuro.e.telefonica.net.
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina · ESRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversidad de Extremadura · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic health is increasingly concerned with recognising factors that lead to sex differences in stroke. We conducted a study to determine the effect of sex on knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs, and how both are perceived, in a representative sample of adults.

methodsA representative sample of the population of Extremadura, Spain was selected using a double randomisation technique. Previously trained medical students carried out face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire.

results2409 subjects were interviewed [59.9 % women; mean age (SD) 49.0 (18.7) years]. Seventy-three percent of all subjects reported at least one correct warning sign of stroke (OR: 1.01; 95 % CI: 0.84-1.21). The most frequently mentioned warning signs were sudden weakness, dizziness, and headache. There were no sex differences regarding the types of warning symptoms that respondents listed. Women displayed better knowledge of risk factors than men (OR: 1.23; 95 % CI: 1.05-1.46). Women were more likely to name hypertension as a risk factor for stroke whereas men more frequently listed smoking, alcohol consumption and a sedentary lifestyle as risk factors. In response to stroke, women were significantly less likely than men to choose to call an ambulance or to go immediately to hospital (OR: 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.60-0.85).

conclusionsStroke knowledge is suboptimal in both men and women. We detected better knowledge of stroke risk factors in women, as well as differences in the type of risk factors listed by men and women. There were significant sex differences regarding response to stroke or to its warning signs.

Indexed as

AwarenessSex FactorsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSpainStroke

Identifiers

PMID26499113
PMCPMC4620012
OpenAlexW1924756245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.