Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26498662›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

The unique transcriptional response produced by concurrent estrogen and progesterone treatment in breast cancer cells results in upregulation of growth factor pathways and switching from a Luminal A to a Basal-like subtype.

Eleanor F Need, Luke A Selth, Andrew P Trotta, Damien A Leach, Lauren Giorgio, Melissa A O'Loughlin, Eric Smith, Peter G Gill, Wendy V Ingman, J Dinny Graham and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Up-regulation of the kinase geneThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cancer Stem Cell Phenotypes in ERMolecular cancer research : MCR · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor F NeedCancer Biology Group, The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, DX465701, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, 5011, South Australia, Australia. Eleanor.need@adelaide.edu.au.
Luke A SelthDame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories and Adelaide Prostate Cancer Research Centre, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Luke.selth@adelaide.edu.au.
Andrew P TrottaCancer Biology Group, The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, DX465701, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, 5011, South Australia, Australia. Trotta.andrew@gmail.com.
Damien A LeachCancer Biology Group, The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, DX465701, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, 5011, South Australia, Australia. Damien.leach@adelaide.edu.au.
Lauren GiorgioCancer Biology Group, The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, DX465701, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, 5011, South Australia, Australia. lauren.giorgio@gmail.com.
Melissa A O'LoughlinCancer Biology Group, The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, DX465701, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, 5011, South Australia, Australia. melol@adam.com.au.
Eric SmithSolid Cancer Regulation Research Group, The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Eric.smith@adelaide.edu.au.
Peter G GillSchool of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. grantley.gill@adelaide.edu.au.
Wendy V IngmanSchool of Medicine at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. wendy.ingman@adelaide.edu.au.
J Dinny GrahamCentre for Cancer Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney Medical School, Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia. dinny.graham@sydney.edu.au.
Grant BuchananCancer Biology Group, The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, DX465701, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, 5011, South Australia, Australia. grant.buchanan@adelaide.edu.au.
University of Adelaide · AUBasil Hetzel Institute · AUCentre for Cancer Biology · AUQueen Elizabeth Hospital · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn breast cancer, progesterone receptor (PR) positivity or abundance is positively associated with survival and treatment response. It was initially believed that PR was a useful diagnostic marker of estrogen receptor activity, but increasingly PR has been recognised to play an important biological role in breast homeostasis, carcinogenesis and metastasis. Although PR expression is almost exclusively observed in estrogen receptor positive tumors, few studies have investigated the cellular mechanisms of PR action in the context of ongoing estrogen signalling.

methodsIn this study, we contrast PR function in estrogen pretreated ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells with vehicle treated ZR-75-1 and T-47D breast cancer cells using expression microarrays and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing.

resultsEstrogen cotreatment caused a dramatic increase in the number of genes regulated by progesterone in ZR-75-1 cells. In T-47D cells that have naturally high levels of PR, estrogen and progesterone cotreatment resulted in a reduction in the number of regulated genes in comparison to treatment with either hormone alone. At a genome level, estrogen pretreatment of ZR-75-1 cells led to a 10-fold increase in the number of PR DNA binding sites detected using ChIP-sequencing. Time course assessment of progesterone regulated genes in the context of estrogen pretreatment highlighted a series of important regulatory pathways, including those driven by epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR). Importantly, progesterone applied to cells pretreated with estradiol resulted in switching of the PAM50-determined intrinsic breast cancer subtype from Luminal A to Basal-like, and increased the Oncotype DX® Unscaled Recurrence Score.

conclusionEstrogen pretreatment of breast cancer cells increases PR steady state levels, resulting in an unequivocal progesterone response that upregulates key members of growth factor pathways. The transformative changes progesterone exerts on the breast cancer subtype suggest that these subtyping tools should be used with caution in premenopausal women.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorErbB ReceptorsEstrogensFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsProgesteroneReceptors, ProgesteroneTranscriptional ActivationTreatment OutcomeUp-RegulationEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsEstrogensProgesteroneReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID26498662
PMCPMC4620010
OpenAlexW1960802507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.