Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26498381›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Phenotypic, Morphological and Adhesive Differences of Human Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Cultured on Murine versus Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Doreen Reichert, Jens Friedrichs, Steffi Ritter, Theresa Käubler, Carsten Werner, Martin Bornhäuser, Denis Corbeil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bone marrow vasculature advancedFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Doreen ReichertTissue Engineering Laboratories (BIOTEC), Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Jens FriedrichsInstitute for Biofunctional Polymer Materials, Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Steffi RitterTissue Engineering Laboratories (BIOTEC), Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Theresa KäublerTissue Engineering Laboratories (BIOTEC), Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Carsten WernerInstitute for Biofunctional Polymer Materials, Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Martin BornhäuserMedical Clinic and Polyclinic I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Denis CorbeilTissue Engineering Laboratories (BIOTEC), Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
TU Dresden · DELeibniz Institute of Polymer Research · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenogenic transplantation models have been developed to study human hematopoiesis in immunocompromised murine recipients. They still have limitations and therefore it is important to delineate all players within the bone marrow that could account for species-specific differences. Here, we evaluated the proliferative capacity, morphological and physical characteristics of human CD34(+) hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) after co-culture on murine or human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). After seven days, human CD34(+)CD133(-) HSPCs expanded to similar extents on both feeder layers while cellular subsets comprising primitive CD34(+)CD133(+) and CD133(+)CD34(-) phenotypes are reduced fivefold on murine MSCs. The number of migrating HSPCs was also reduced on murine cells suggesting that MSC adhesion influences cellular polarization of HSPC. We used atomic force microscopy-based single-cell force spectroscopy to quantify their adhesive interactions. We found threefold higher detachment forces of human HSPCs from murine MSCs compared to human ones. This difference is related to the N-cadherin expression level on murine MSCs since its knockdown abolished their differential adhesion properties with human HSPCs. Our observations highlight phenotypic, morphological and adhesive differences of human HSPCs when cultured on murine or human MSCs, which raise some caution in data interpretation when xenogenic transplantation models are used.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionAC133 AntigenAnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, CD34CadherinsCell DifferentiationCell MovementCell PolarityCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesGlycoproteinsHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsAC133 AntigenAntigens, CDAntigens, CD34CadherinsGlycoproteinsPeptidesPROM1 protein, humanProm1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID26498381
PMCPMC4620509
OpenAlexW1888029756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.