Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26498365›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2015

Genome sequencing of the extinct Eurasian wild aurochs, Bos primigenius, illuminates the phylogeography and evolution of cattle.

Stephen D E Park, David A Magee, Paul A McGettigan, Matthew D Teasdale, Ceiridwen J Edwards, Amanda J Lohan, Alison Murphy, Martin Braud, Mark T Donoghue, Yuan Liu and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Stephen D E ParkIdentiGEN Ltd, Unit 2, Trinity Enterprise Centre, Pearse Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. sdepark@gmail.com.
David A MageeAnimal Genomics Laboratory, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. david.magee@ucd.ie.
Paul A McGettiganAnimal Genomics Laboratory, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. paul.mcgettigan@ucd.ie.
Matthew D TeasdaleSmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland. teasdalm@tcd.ie.
Ceiridwen J EdwardsResearch Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK. ceiridwen.edwards@gmail.com.
Amanda J LohanUCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland. amanda.lohan@ucd.ie.
Alison MurphyUCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland. alison.murphy@ucd.ie.
Martin BraudGenetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Plant and AgriBiosciences Research Centre (PABC), School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland. braud.martin@gmail.com.
Mark T DonoghueGenetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Plant and AgriBiosciences Research Centre (PABC), School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland. mta.donoghue@gmail.com.
Yuan LiuBGI Shenzhen, Beishan Industrial Zone, Yantian District, Shenzhen, 518083, China. liuyuan@genomics.cn.
Andrew T ChamberlainFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. andrew.chamberlain@manchester.ac.uk.
Kévin Rue-AlbrechtAnimal Genomics Laboratory, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. kevin.rue@ucdconnect.ie.
Steven SchroederAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350, USA. steven.schroeder@ars.usda.gov.
Charles SpillaneGenetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Plant and AgriBiosciences Research Centre (PABC), School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland. charles.spillane@nuigalway.ie.
Shuaishuai TaiBGI Shenzhen, Beishan Industrial Zone, Yantian District, Shenzhen, 518083, China. shuaishuai.tai@genomics.cn.
Daniel G BradleySmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland. dbradley@tcd.ie.
Tad S SonstegardAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350, USA. tad.sonstegard@ars.usda.gov.
Brendan J LoftusUCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland. brendan.loftus@ucd.ie.
David E MacHughAnimal Genomics Laboratory, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. david.machugh@ucd.ie.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestication of the now-extinct wild aurochs, Bos primigenius, gave rise to the two major domestic extant cattle taxa, B. taurus and B. indicus. While previous genetic studies have shed some light on the evolutionary relationships between European aurochs and modern cattle, important questions remain unanswered, including the phylogenetic status of aurochs, whether gene flow from aurochs into early domestic populations occurred, and which genomic regions were subject to selection processes during and after domestication. Here, we address these questions using whole-genome sequencing data generated from an approximately 6,750-year-old British aurochs bone and genome sequence data from 81 additional cattle plus genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism data from a diverse panel of 1,225 modern animals.

resultsPhylogenomic analyses place the aurochs as a distinct outgroup to the domestic B. taurus lineage, supporting the predominant Near Eastern origin of European cattle. Conversely, traditional British and Irish breeds share more genetic variants with this aurochs specimen than other European populations, supporting localized gene flow from aurochs into the ancestors of modern British and Irish cattle, perhaps through purposeful restocking by early herders in Britain. Finally, the functions of genes showing evidence for positive selection in B. taurus are enriched for neurobiology, growth, metabolism and immunobiology, suggesting that these biological processes have been important in the domestication of cattle.

conclusionsThis work provides important new information regarding the origins and functional evolution of modern cattle, revealing that the interface between early European domestic populations and wild aurochs was significantly more complex than previously thought.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsCattleEnglandEuropeExtinction, BiologicalGenetic VariationGenomicsPhylogeographyRuminantsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26498365
PMCPMC4620651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.