Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26498356›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2015

Cigarette smoking during pregnancy and preeclampsia risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Jun Wei, Cai-Xia Liu, Ting-Ting Gong, Qi-Jun Wu, Lang Wu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Occupational Risk Factors and Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun WeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Cai-Xia LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ting-Ting GongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qi-Jun WuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Lang WuCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Vanderbilt Training Program in Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology of CancerR25CA160056 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEIMBURGER, DOUGLAS CORBETT, SHU, XIAO-OU · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Vanderbilt-Shanghai Chronic Disease Research Training ProgramD43TW008313 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008313NCI NIH HHS R25 CA160056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although evidence from epidemiological studies evaluating the association between cigarette smoking during pregnancy and preeclampsia risk has been systematically reviewed, the findings have been out of date. To further clarify the relationship, we conducted this comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective studies. We searched PubMed and Web of Science up to August 2015 to identify prospective studies that evaluated the association between cigarette smoking during pregnancy and preeclampsia risk. Random-effects models were used to estimate summarized relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seventeen prospective studies involving 62,089 preeclampsia patients from a total of approximately 1.8 million subjects were included. Overall, there was a significant negative association between smoking during pregnancy and incidence of preeclampsia (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.60-0.75), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 91.7%). Such an inverse association was also detected in strata of subgroup analyses according to study location, study sample size, parity of populations, singleton pregnancy, and adjustment for potential confounders including maternal age, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, body mass index, and gender of infant. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that smoking during pregnancy is inversely associated with incidence of preeclampsia. Further large scale multi-center prospective studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Indexed as

SmokingFemaleHumansIncidencePre-EclampsiaPregnancyProspective StudiesRiskcigarette smokingmeta-analysispreeclampsiarisk factor

Identifiers

PMID26498356
PMCPMC4791258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.