ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2016
Segmental assessments of coronary plaque morphology and composition by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017Pooled it
- Dense calcium and lesion-specific ischemia: A comparison of CCTA with fractional flow reserve.Atherosclerosis · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index for identifying functionally significant stenotic lesions. A FFR value of ≤0.75 is considered clinically significant and indicative of physiological ischemia. Focal lesions with 30-80 % stenosis by angiography with lesion lengths of less than 20 mm were selected from left anterior descending arteries of 74 patients. The analysis for the total lesion was processed first, and then each lesion was divided into three segments to assess the each segment. Data on plaque geometry and composition of two FFR groups, FFR ≤ 0.75 and FFR > 0.75, were compared by total and segmental analysis. Lesions with FFR ≤ 0.75 had more fibrofatty tissue (13.5 ± 7.4 vs. 10.2 ± 6.5%, p = 0.05) and less dense calcium (7.2 ± 5.3 vs. 11.9 ± 7.5%, p = 0.01) compared to lesions with FFR > 0.75. The content of necrotic core in mid segments was higher compared to proximal and distal segments (22.9 ± 10.6, 20.2 ± 10.9, 17.1 ± 11.2%, respectively, p = 0.032) in lesions with FFR > 0.75 but the difference was less obvious in lesions with FFR ≤ 0.75 (17.9 ± 9.9, 18.7 ± 9.9, 15.8 ± 9.0%, respectively, p = 0.533). Coronary lesions with FFR > 0.75 have larger content of dense calcium and slightly less fibrofatty tissue compared to lesions with FFR ≤ 0.75. While segmental plaque compositions for each segment show noticeable variations in lesions with FFR > 0.75 such as high concentrations of necrotic core in mid segment, these differences in each segment become obscure in FFR ≤ 0.75 and are evenly distributed across the lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26498340What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.