Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26498335›Full record

SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2015

Prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in the risk stratification of syncope: a systematic review.

Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Rosa Ramaekers, Mohammed Omair Rahman, Ian Gilmour Stiell, Lindsey Sikora, Sarah-Louise Kelly, Michael Christ, Pierre-Geraud Claret, Matthew James Reed

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Arrhythmic syncope: From diagnosis to management.World journal of cardiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Do High-sensitivity Troponin and Natriuretic Peptide Predict Death or Serious Cardiac Outcomes After Syncope?Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Reliability of Clinical Assessments in Older Adults With Syncope or Near Syncope.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Venkatesh ThiruganasambandamoorthyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. vthirug@ohri.ca.
Rosa RamaekersClinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, 6th Floor, Rm F650, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Mohammed Omair RahmanClinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, 6th Floor, Rm F650, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Ian Gilmour StiellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Lindsey SikoraHealth Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sarah-Louise KellyEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Michael ChristDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Nurunberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Pierre-Geraud ClaretClinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, 6th Floor, Rm F650, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Matthew James ReedEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Ottawa · CAEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBOttawa Hospital Research InstituteNuremberg Hospital · DEOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of cardiac biomarkers in risk stratification of syncope is unclear. We undertook a systematic review to assess their predictive value for short-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE and Cochrane databases from inception to July 2014. We included studies involving adult syncope patients that evaluated cardiac biomarker levels for risk stratification during acute management and excluded case reports, reviews and studies involving children. Primary outcome (MACE) included death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, myocardial infarction (MI), structural heart disease, pulmonary embolism, significant hemorrhage or cardiac procedural interventions. Secondary outcome analysis assessed for prediction of MI, cardiac syncope and death. Two reviewers extracted patient-level data based on the cut-off reported. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were calculated using patient-level data. A total of 1862 articles were identified, and 11 studies with 4246 patients were included. Studies evaluated 3 biomarkers: contemporary troponin (2693 patients), natriuretic peptides (1353 patients) and high-sensitive troponin (819 patients). The pooled sensitivities and specificities for MACE were: contemporary troponin 0.29 (95 % CI 0.24, 0.34) and 0.88 (95 % CI 0.86, 0.89); natriuretic peptides 0.77 (95 % CI 0.69, 0.85) and 0.73 (95 % CI 0.70, 0.76); high-sensitive troponin 0.74 (95 % CI 0.65, 0.83) and 0.65 (95 % CI 0.62, 0.69), respectively. Natriuretic peptides and high-sensitive troponin showed good diagnostic characteristics for both primary and secondary outcomes. Natriuretic peptides and high-sensitive troponin might be useful in risk stratification.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationRisk AssessmentBiomarkersHumansMyocardial InfarctionNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPrognosisSyncopeTroponinBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainTroponinArrhythmiasDeathMajor adverse cardiac eventsMeta-analysisNatriuretic peptideRisk stratificationSyncopeSystematic reviewTroponin

Identifiers

PMID26498335
OpenAlexW2172795178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.