Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26498141›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2016

Can a pill prevent HIV? Negotiating the biomedicalisation of HIV prevention.

Ingrid Young, Paul Flowers, Lisa McDaid

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Navigating the Viral Divide: Sexual and Gender Minority Community Perspectives on Treatment as Prevention.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Somatechnics · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid YoungMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK.
Paul FlowersSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Lisa McDaidMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK.
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBGlasgow Caledonian University · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Medical Research Council MC_U130031238Medical Research Council MC_U130031238/MC_UU_12017/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/11Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article examines how biomedicalisation is encountered, responded to and negotiated within and in relation to new biomedical forms of HIV prevention. We draw on exploratory focus group discussions on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and treatment as prevention (TasP) to examine how the processes of biomedicalisation are affected by and affect the diverse experiences of communities who have been epidemiologically framed as 'vulnerable' to HIV and towards whom PrEP and TasP will most likely be targeted. We found that participants were largely critical of the perceived commodification of HIV prevention as seen through PrEP, although this was in tension with the construction of being medical consumers by potential PrEP candidates. We also found how deeply entrenched forms of HIV stigma and homophobia can shape and obfuscate the consumption and management of HIV-related knowledge. Finally, we found that rather than seeing TasP or PrEP as 'liberating' through reduced levels of infectiousness or risk of transmission, social and legal requirements of responsibility in relation to HIV risk reinforced unequal forms of biomedical self-governance. Overall, we found that the stratifying processes of biomedicalisation will have significant implications in how TasP, PrEP and HIV prevention more generally are negotiated.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultAnti-HIV AgentsDisease Transmission, InfectiousEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaTransients and MigrantsAnti-HIV Agentsbiomedicalfocus groupsgay/lesbianHIVimmigrants/migrants/refugeessexual health

Identifiers

PMID26498141
PMCPMC5102670
OpenAlexW2109246724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.