ArticleOncotarget2015
Identification of hallmarks of lung adenocarcinoma prognosis using whole genome sequencing.
Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Efficacy of anlotinib and sintilimab in treating lung adenocarcinoma with RET fusion and PD-L1 expression.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Assessment of MYC and TERT copy number variations in lung cancer using digital PCR.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- CNVIntegrate: the first multi-ethnic database for identifying copy number variations associated with cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Article
- Predicting chemosensitivity using drug perturbed gene dynamics.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas.BMC medical genomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In conjunction with clinical characteristics, prognostic biomarkers are essential for choosing optimal therapies to lower the mortality of lung adenocarcinoma. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 7 cancerous-noncancerous tissue pairs was performed to explore the comparative copy number variations (CNVs) associated with lung adenocarcinoma. The frequencies of top ranked CNVs were verified in an independent set of 114 patients and then the roles of target CNVs in disease prognosis were assessed in 313 patients. The WGS yielded 2604 CNVs. After frequency validation and biological function screening of top 10 CNVs, 9 mutant driver genes from 7 CNVs were further analyzed for an association with survival. Compared with the PBXIP1 amplified copy number, unamplified carriers had a 0.62-fold (95%CI = 0.43-0.91) decreased risk of death. Compared with an amplified TERT, those with an unamplified TERT had a 35% reduction (95% CI = 3%-56%) in risk of lung adenocarcinoma progression. Cases with both unamplified PBXIP1 and TERT had a median 34.32-month extension of overall survival and 34.55-month delay in disease progression when compared with both amplified CNVs. This study demonstrates that CNVs of TERT and PBXIP1 have the potential to translate into the clinic and be used to improve outcomes for patients with this fatal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.