Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26496834›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Nitrogen fluxes at the root-soil interface show a mismatch of nitrogen fertilizer supply and sugarcane root uptake capacity.

Richard Brackin, Torgny Näsholm, Nicole Robinson, Stéphane Guillou, Kerry Vinall, Prakash Lakshmanan, Susanne Schmidt, Erich Inselsbacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Droplet Microfluidic-BasedEnvironmental science & technology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Organic Nitrogen Uptake and Assimilation inFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard BrackinSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Torgny NäsholmDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden.
Nicole RobinsonSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Stéphane GuillouSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Kerry VinallSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Prakash LakshmananSugar Research Australia, 50 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, QLD 4068, Australia.
Susanne SchmidtSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Erich InselsbacherDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally only ≈50% of applied nitrogen (N) fertilizer is captured by crops, and the remainder can cause pollution via runoff and gaseous emissions. Synchronizing soil N supply and crop demand will address this problem, however current soil analysis methods provide little insight into delivery and acquisition of N forms by roots. We used microdialysis, a novel technique for in situ quantification of soil nutrient fluxes, to measure N fluxes in sugarcane cropping soils receiving different fertilizer regimes, and compare these with N uptake capacities of sugarcane roots. We show that in fertilized sugarcane soils, fluxes of inorganic N exceed the uptake capacities of sugarcane roots by several orders of magnitude. Contrary, fluxes of organic N closely matched roots' uptake capacity. These results indicate root uptake capacity constrains plant acquisition of inorganic N. This mismatch between soil N supply and root N uptake capacity is a likely key driver for low N efficiency in the studied crop system. Our results also suggest that (i) the relative contribution of inorganic N for plant nutrition may be overestimated when relying on soil extracts as indicators for root-available N, and (ii) organic N may contribute more to crop N supply than is currently assumed.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAmmonium CompoundsCrops, AgriculturalKineticsNitrogenNitrogen IsotopesPlant RootsSaccharumSoilAmino AcidsAmmonium CompoundsNitrogenNitrogen IsotopesSoil

Identifiers

PMID26496834
PMCPMC4620560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.