Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26496829›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Blood-Brain Barrier Opening in Behaving Non-Human Primates via Focused Ultrasound with Systemically Administered Microbubbles.

Matthew E Downs, Amanda Buch, Maria Eleni Karakatsani, Elisa E Konofagou, Vincent P Ferrera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Acoustic Holograms for Bilateral Blood-Brain Barrier Opening in a Mouse Model.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A review of bioeffects induced by focused ultrasound combined with microbubbles on the neurovascular unit.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  19. Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Intranasal Brain Drug Delivery Technique (FUSIN).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew E DownsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Amanda BuchDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Maria Eleni KarakatsaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Elisa E KonofagouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Vincent P FerreraDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Assessment of Ultrsound-facilitated Neurotherapeutics in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG038961 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2011 to 2020
$5.1M
Optimization of ultrasound-facilitated blood-brain barrier openingR01EB009041 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2008 to 2017
$4.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038961NIA NIH HHS R01AG038961NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009041NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB9041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past fifteen years, focused ultrasound coupled with intravenously administered microbubbles (FUS) has been proven an effective, non-invasive technique to open the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in vivo. Here we show that FUS can safely and effectively open the BBB at the basal ganglia and thalamus in alert non-human primates (NHP) while they perform a behavioral task. The BBB was successfully opened in 89% of cases at the targeted brain regions of alert NHP with an average volume of opening 28% larger than prior anesthetized FUS procedures. Safety (lack of edema or microhemorrhage) of FUS was also improved during alert compared to anesthetized procedures. No physiological effects (change in heart rate, motor evoked potentials) were observed during any of the procedures. Furthermore, the application of FUS did not disrupt reaching behavior, but in fact improved performance by decreasing reaction times by 23 ms, and significantly decreasing touch error by 0.76 mm on average.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierPrimatesAnimalsBehavior, AnimalMicrobubblesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID26496829
PMCPMC4620488
OpenAlexW1855337837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.