ArticleBMC genomics2015
Impact of library preparation protocols and template quantity on the metagenomic reconstruction of a mock microbial community.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Pooled it
- Usability of rectal swabs for microbiome sampling in a cohort study of hematological and oncological patients.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Analytic attributes of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing methodology for human gut microbiota characterization.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking of shotgun sequencing depth reveals the potential and limitations of shallow metagenomics and strain-level analysis.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Standardizing vaginal microbial profiling: evaluating swab materials, storage conditions, and host DNA depletion strategies.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Using Carrier DNA in Ultra-Low Input Library Preparations for Next-Generation Sequencing.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2026Article
- Genomic GC bias correction improves species abundance estimation from metagenomic data.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Host species and geographic location shape microbial diversity and functional potential in the conifer needle microbiome.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- Benchmarking and optimizing qualitative and quantitative pipelines in environmental metatranscriptomics using mixture controlling experiments.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Enhancing Clinical Utility: Utilization of International Standards and Guidelines for Metagenomic Sequencing in Infectious Disease Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Breaking the Ice: A Review of Phages in Polar Ecosystems.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Review
- The Diversity of Bacteriophages in the Human Gut.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- The human gut virome: composition, colonization, interactions, and impacts on human health.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- An improved workflow for accurate and robust healthcare environmental surveillance using metagenomics.Microbiome · 2022Article
- Benchmarking second and third-generation sequencing platforms for microbial metagenomics.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Toward efficient and high-fidelity metagenomic data from sub-nanogram DNA: evaluation of library preparation and decontamination methods.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Introduction to the principles and methods underlying the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes from metagenomic data.MicrobiologyOpen · 2022Review
- Host-Associated Phages Disperse across the Extraterrestrial Analogue Antarctica.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Dissecting the dominant hot spring microbial populations based on community-wide sampling at single-cell genomic resolution.The ISME journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid development of sequencing technologies has provided access to environments that were either once thought inhospitable to life altogether or that contain too few cells to be analyzed using genomics approaches. While 16S rRNA gene microbial community sequencing has revolutionized our understanding of community composition and diversity over time and space, it only provides a crude estimate of microbial functional and metabolic potential. Alternatively, shotgun metagenomics allows comprehensive sampling of all genetic material in an environment, without any underlying primer biases. Until recently, one of the major bottlenecks of shotgun metagenomics has been the requirement for large initial DNA template quantities during library preparation.
resultsHere, we investigate the effects of varying template concentrations across three low biomass library preparation protocols on their ability to accurately reconstruct a mock microbial community of known composition. We analyze the effects of input DNA quantity and library preparation method on library insert size, GC content, community composition, assembly quality and metagenomic binning. We found that library preparation method and the amount of starting material had significant impacts on the mock community metagenomes. In particular, GC content shifted towards more GC rich sequences at the lower input quantities regardless of library prep method, the number of low quality reads that could not be mapped to the reference genomes increased with decreasing input quantities, and the different library preparation methods had an impact on overall metagenomic community composition.
conclusionsThis benchmark study provides recommendations for library creation of representative and minimally biased metagenome shotgun sequencing, enabling insights into functional attributes of low biomass ecosystem microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.