ArticleCurrent microbiology2016
Changes in Microbial Composition of Wastewater During Treatment in a Full-Scale Plant.
Article in Current microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conventional wastewater treatment and reuse site practices modify bacterial community structure but do not eliminate some opportunistic pathogens in reclaimed water.The Science of the total environment · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The monitoring of wastewater treatment plants is important for their proper functioning as well as for re-use of water and also to avoid possible circulation of human or animal pathogens in our environment. The samples in this study originated from a full-scale wastewater treatment plant where the structure of the bacterial community was monitored using 454-pyrosequencing. The composition differed in different parts of the plant. In the effluent, bacteria belonging to phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, TM7 and Bacteroidetes were most frequently detected. The presence of Mycobacterium sp., Mycobacterium avium, Norovirus, Hepatitis A and E viruses was examined using quantitative real-time PCR. Mycobacterium sp. was detected in the effluent in quantities of up to 10(4) cells/ml. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and subsp. hominissuis were detected in amounts of up to 10(3) cells/ml, and Norovirus group 1 and 2 were also detected. Our findings show the importance of monitoring and controlling the occurrence of specific pathogens in effluent, mainly because of the negative impact on human health when the water is reused.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26496734What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.