Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26496725›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2016

Circadian mRNA expression: insights from modeling and transcriptomics.

Sarah Lück, Pål O Westermark

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A conditionalScience advances · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Circadian rhythms in septic shock patients.Annals of intensive care · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Circadian rhythms and the kidney.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2018
    Review
  10. Circadian Posttranscriptional Regulatory Mechanisms in Mammals.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Principles for circadian orchestration of metabolic pathways.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Toward Multiscale Models of Cyanobacterial Growth: A Modular Approach.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah LückInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Pål O WestermarkInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany. pal-olof.westermark@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circadian clocks synchronize organisms to the 24 h rhythms of the environment. These clocks persist under constant conditions, have their origin at the cellular level, and produce an output of rhythmic mRNA expression affecting thousands of transcripts in many mammalian cell types. Here, we review the charting of circadian output rhythms in mRNA expression, focusing on mammals. We emphasize the challenges in statistics, interpretation, and quantitative descriptions that such investigations have faced and continue to face, and outline remaining outstanding questions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationCircadian ClocksGene Expression ProfilingModels, GeneticRNA, MessengerRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalRNA, MessengerBiostatisticsCircadianmRNA expressionPost-transcriptional regulationSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID26496725
PMCPMC11108398
OpenAlexW2133518048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.