Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26496723›Full record

ReviewCurrent pediatric reviews2016

Safe Infant Sleep Interventions: What is the Evidence for Successful Behavior Change?

Rachel Y Moon, Fern R Hauck, Eve R Colson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pediatric reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Baby Box scheme in Scotland: A study of public attitudes and social value.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of a Multisite Safe Infant Sleep Education and Crib Distribution Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Infant Safe Sleep Promotion: Increasing Capacity of Child Protective Services Employees.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel Y MoonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, PO Box 800386, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA. rym4z@virginia.edu.
Fern R Hauck
Eve R Colson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and other sleep-related infant deaths, such as accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed and ill-defined deaths, account for >4000 deaths annually in the USA. Evidence-based recommendations for reducing the risk of sleep-related deaths have been published, but some caregivers resist adoption of these recommendations. Multiple interventions to change infant sleep-related practices of parents and professionals have been implemented. In this review, we will discuss illustrative examples of safe infant sleep interventions and evidence of their effectiveness. Facilitators of and barriers to change, as well as the limitations of the data currently available for these interventions, will be considered.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorBedding and LinensCaregiversCause of DeathEvidence-Based MedicineHealth EducationHumansInfantInfant MortalitySafetySleepSudden Infant Death

Identifiers

PMID26496723
PMCPMC4997961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.