Trial reportMedicine2015
Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Pirfenidone in Chinese Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients.
Trial report in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01504334 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial for the Safety and Efficacy of Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial for the Safety and Efficacy of Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network meta-analysis of pharmacological treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evaluating effects on lung function.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy of antifibrotic drugs, nintedanib and pirfenidone, in treatment of progressive pulmonary fibrosis in both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2021Pooled it
- The effects and safety of pirfenidone in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.European journal of medical research · 2021Pooled it
- Health-related quality of life of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of combined pirfenidone and N-acetylcysteine therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of antifibrotics on health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseasePooled it
- Gastrointestinal and skin safety evaluation of pirfenidone versus nintedanib: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance and randomized controlled trials.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Perioperative nintedanib for lung resection in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Post-marketing safety concerns with pirfenidone and nintedanib: an analysis of individual case safety reports from the FDA adverse event reporting system database and the Japanese adverse drug event report databases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- An adjudication algorithm for respiratory-related hospitalisation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Article
- The 6-min walk test as a primary end-point in interstitial lung disease.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022Review
- Forced Oscillation Measurements in Patients with Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia Subjected to Pulmonary Rehabilitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone Combined With Immunosuppressant Therapy in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A 24-Week Prospective Controlled Cohort Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Safety of N-Acetylcysteine at High Doses in Chronic Respiratory Diseases: A Review.Drug safety · 2021Review
- Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Pirfenidone and Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide for Refractory Interstitial Lung Disease Associated With Connective Tissue Disease: A Case-Series of Seven Patients.Archives of rheumatology · 2020Article
- Real-world experiences: Efficacy and tolerability of pirfenidone in clinical practice.PloS one · 2020Article
- Choice of Methodology Impacts Outcome in Indirect Comparisons of Drugs for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) lacks effective treatment. Pirfenidone has been used to treat IPF patients. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) exerts antioxidant and antifibrotic effects on IPF cases.This study is a double-blind, modified placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of pirfenidone in Chinese IPF patients. We randomly assigned the enrolled Chinese IPF patients with mild to moderate impairment of pulmonary function to receive either oral pirfenidone (1800 mg per day) and NAC (1800 mg per day) or placebo and NAC (1800 mg per day) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoints were the changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) and walking distance and the lowest SPO2 during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at week 48. The key secondary endpoint was the progression-free survival time. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as number NCT01504334.Eighty-six patients were screened, and 76 cases were enrolled (pirfenidone + NAC: 38; placebo + NAC: 38). The effect of pirfenidone treatment was significant at the 24th week, but this effect did not persist to the 48th week. At the 24th week, the mean decline in both FVC and ΔSPO2 (%) during the 6MWT in the pirfenidone group was lower than that in the control group (-0.08 ± 0.20 L vs -0.22 ± 0.29 L, P = 0.02 and -3.44% ± 4.51% vs -6.29% ± 6.06%, P = 0.03, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between these 2 groups at the 48th week (-0.15 ± 0.25 L vs -0.25 ± 0.28 L, P = 0.11 and -4.25% ± 7.27% vs -5.31% ± 5.49%, P = 0.51, respectively). The pirfenidone treatment group did not achieve the maximal distance difference on the 6MWT at either the 24th or the 48th week. But pirfenidone treatment prolonged the progression-free survival time in the IPF patients (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval: 1.092-3.242, P = 0.02). In the pirfenidone group, the adverse event (AE) rate (52.63%) was higher than that in the control group (26.3%, P = 0.03). Rash was more common in the pirfenidone group (39.5% vs 13.2%, P = 0.02).Compared with placebo combined with high-dose NAC, pirfenidone combined with high-dose NAC prolonged the progression-free survival of Chinese IPF patients with mild to moderate impairment of pulmonary function. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01504334).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.