Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26496228›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2016

A unified set-based test with adaptive filtering for gene-environment interaction analyses.

Qianying Liu, Lin S Chen, Dan L Nicolae, Brandon L Pierce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qianying LiuSanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, U.S.A.
Lin S ChenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, U.S.A.
Dan L NicolaeDepartment of Medicine, Statistics, and Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, U.S.A.
Brandon L PierceDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, U.S.A.

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK020595 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Matthew J Brady · 2013 to 2026
$20.9M
Using Genomics to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities in the African DiasporaU01CA161032 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HUO, DEZHENG, OLOPADE, OLUFUNMILAYO F. · 2012 to 2015
$3.6M
Integrative multivariate association and genomic analysesR01GM108711 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHEN, LIN · 2014 to 2022
$3.1M
Harnessing GTEx to Create Transcriptome Knowledge and Inform Disease BiologyR01MH101820 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI COX, NANCY J, NICOLAE, DAN LIVIU · 2013 to 2015
$2.3M
Multivariate functional analysis of the genetic basis of cancerR03CA174984 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHEN, LIN · 2013 to 2014
$158k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA174984NCI NIH HHS U01 CA161032NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020595NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108711NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In genome-wide gene-environment interaction (GxE) studies, a common strategy to improve power is to first conduct a filtering test and retain only the SNPs that pass the filtering in the subsequent GxE analyses. Inspired by two-stage tests and gene-based tests in GxE analysis, we consider the general problem of jointly testing a set of parameters when only a few are truly from the alternative hypothesis and when filtering information is available. We propose a unified set-based test that simultaneously considers filtering on individual parameters and testing on the set. We derive the exact distribution and approximate the power function of the proposed unified statistic in simplified settings, and use them to adaptively calculate the optimal filtering threshold for each set. In the context of gene-based GxE analysis, we show that although the empirical power function may be affected by many factors, the optimal filtering threshold corresponding to the peak of the power curve primarily depends on the size of the gene. We further propose a resampling algorithm to calculate P-values for each gene given the estimated optimal filtering threshold. The performance of the method is evaluated in simulation studies and illustrated via a genome-wide gene-gender interaction analysis using pancreatic cancer genome-wide association data.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalGene-Environment InteractionModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsBiometryComputer SimulationFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMalePancreatic NeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSex FactorsAdaptive filteringA unified testGene-environment interactionsGenome-wide interaction studiesSet-based (or gene-based) test

Identifiers

PMID26496228
PMCPMC4842175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.