Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26496082›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of surgery2016

Differential Effects of Intraoperative Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on Respiratory Outcome in Major Abdominal Surgery Versus Craniotomy.

Myrthe A C de Jong, Karim S Ladha, Marcos F Vidal Melo, Anne Kathrine Staehr-Rye, Edward A Bittner, Tobias Kurth, Matthias Eikermann

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03198208 unknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Intraoperative Fentanyl Dose on Postoperative Respiratory Complications

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2007 to 2018Enrolled183,396ConditionsFentanyl, Opioid Use, Surgery, Respiratory ComplicationArmsFentanyl dose administration
NCT04108130 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

An Anesthesia-Centered Bundle to Reduce Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: The PRIME-AIR Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled794ConditionsPostoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsArmsPreoperative Education, Intraoperative PEEP (Positive End-Expiratory Pressure) Individualization, Individualization of Neuromuscular Blockade, Postoperative Incentive Spirometry, Postoperative Ambulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Translational Role of Rodent Models to Study Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury.Translational perioperative and pain medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Myrthe A C de Jong *Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Karim S Ladha *Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Marcos F Vidal MeloDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Anne Kathrine Staehr-RyeDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Edward A BittnerDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Tobias KurthInserm Research Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics (U897) -Team Neuroepidemiology, Bordeaux, France.
Matthias EikermannDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USHerlev Hospital · DKInserm · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

Regional Tidal Lung Strain and Neutrophilic Inflammation in Early Lung InjuryR01HL121228 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VIDAL MELO, MARCOS F · 2014 to 2023
$6.2M
Intraoperative Protective Ventilation and Postoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsR34HL123438 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VIDAL MELO, MARCOS F · 2015 to 2017
$599k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121228NHLBI NIH HHS R34 HL123438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, we examined whether (1) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has a protective effect on the risk of major postoperative respiratory complications in a cohort of patients undergoing major abdominal surgeries and craniotomies, and (2) the effect of PEEP is differed by surgery type.

backgroundProtective mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes and PEEP reduces compounded postoperative complications after abdominal surgery. However, data regarding the use of intraoperative PEEP is conflicting.

methodsIn this observational study, we included 5915 major abdominal surgery patients and 5063 craniotomy patients. Analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression. The primary outcome was a composite of major postoperative respiratory complications (respiratory failure, reintubation, pulmonary edema, and pneumonia) within 3 days of surgery.

resultsWithin the entire study population (major abdominal surgeries and craniotomies), we found an association between application of PEEP ≥5 cmH2O and a decreased risk of postoperative respiratory complications compared with PEEP <5 cmH2O. Application of PEEP >5 cmH2O was associated with a significant lower odds of respiratory complications in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.39 - 0.72), effects that translated to deceased hospital length of stay [median hospital length of stay : 6 days (4-9 days), incidence rate ratios for each additional day: 0.91 (0.84 - 0.98)], whereas PEEP >5 cmH2O was not significantly associated with reduced odds of respiratory complications or hospital length of stay in patients undergoing craniotomy.

conclusionsThe protective effects of PEEP are procedure specific with meaningful effects observed in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Our data suggest that default mechanical ventilator settings should include PEEP of 5-10 cmH2O during major abdominal surgery.

Indexed as

Intraoperative CarePositive-Pressure RespirationAbdomenAdultAgedCohort StudiesCraniotomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRespiration DisordersTidal Volume

Identifiers

PMID26496082
PMCPMC4841734
OpenAlexW1882560571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.